Magic City SYC/RJCC & Y8

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Friday, April 12, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2535 2594 - 2470
5 - 8 2444 2468 - 2429
9 - 16 2235 2400 - 2057
17 - 32 1927 2090 - 1688
33 - 58 1442 1921 - 855

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Parrish, Evan AIC Fencing Club C24 2594 2339.87
2 Guth, Joseph Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC C24 2577 2321.65
3 Raj, Jay Space City Fencing Academy C23 2500 2242.74
4 sheng, Dalton AIC Fencing Club C24 2470 2217.13
5 Doell, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C24 2468 2212.72
6 Tang, Alexander OnTarget Fencing Club C24 2448 2196.68
7 Zhao, Adam Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2432 2179.89
8 Vaden, Oliver Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C24 2429 2163.56
9 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C22 2400 2139.88
10 Mazaheri, Fletcher Bluegrass Fencers' Club D24 2354 2085.73
11 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club C24 2354 2083.73
12 Zhao, Nathan Bluegrass Fencers' Club D24 2341 2082.41
13 Parker, Isaiah Salle De Long Fencers C24 2206 1926.25
14 Park, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 2100 1835.68
15 Huynh, Matthew Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 2057 1804.57
16 LIM, EUNSEONG Auburn Fencing Club U 2066 1794.39
17 Ge, Felix Fei Renaissance Fencing Club U 2048 1782.32
18 Liu, Alex AIC Fencing Club U 2064 1771.17
19 Boeskin, Nolan Space City Fencing Academy C23 2090 1763.64
20 Marisi, Gabriel Lang Fencing Academy C24 2007 1743.93
21 Pan, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 2004 1738.03
22 Fang, Haoyu Renaissance Fencing Club E24 2004 1737.29
23 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club E24 1955 1691.67
24 LaTorre, Leonardo Renaissance Fencing Club E23 1961 1677.56
25 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) LA International Fencing U 1942 1662.83
26 Xu, Nathan Moe Fencing Club LLC E23 1908 1646.57
27 Kim, Gene Austin Fencers Club U 1968 1640.90
28 Chang, Parker Fencers Club Inc. U 1880 1617.49
29 Slain, Owen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1847 1571.77
30 Zeng, Albert Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1759 1475.02
31 Mazaheri, John Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1714 1422.40
32 Shaw, Spencer Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E23 1688 1407.21
33 Qian, Zekai Gold Fencing Club U 1663 1395.18
34 Jin, Xuechong Daniel Space City Fencing Academy U 1718 1393.67
35 Johnson, Soren Memphis University School Fencing Team D24 1702 1309.21
36 Martire, Luca Manhattan Fencing Center E24 1607 1297.02
37 Kim, Andrew Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1471 1153.50
38 Gogoi, Kavi Renaissance Fencing Club U 1443 1079.34
39 Li, Jayden Star Fencing Academy U 1455 1078.59
40 Grigoryan, Erik Masters Fencing Club U 1574 983.48
41 Barrera, Marcelo Miami Lakes Fencing Club U 1747 936.51
42 Chiang, Aiden Space City Fencing Academy U 1317 908.22
43 Cao, Kellen Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1292 745.87
44 Su, Daniel Birmingham Fencing Club E23 1415 743.41
45 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1334 618.88
46 Susanto, William U 1529 562.23
47 Siggins, Wally Foothills Fencing Academy U 1243 553.76
48 Lee, Aeden Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club U 940 437.60
49 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1314 380.35
50 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1080 314.37
51 Chiu, Vincent Birmingham Fencing Club U 1028 179.40
52 Robertson, Liam Birmingham Fencing Club U 855 149.49
53 Martin, Julian Oxford Park U 1921 39.72
54 Pfrenger, Sebastian Oxford Park U 1890 23.90
55 Rebner, Parker Williamson County Fencing Club U 1018 6.55
56 Drake, Davis Birmingham Fencing Club U 1781 < 0
57 Patel, Aarav Birmingham Fencing Club U 1450 < 0
58 Martin, Sullivan Oxford Park U 1709 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!