Fencing Center of Chicago RYC & RJCC

Youth 10 Women’s Foil (Y10WF)

Saturday, April 20, 2024 at 4:00 PM

Register

Energy Sport Club - Niles, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1928 2073 - 1747
5 - 8 1501 1586 - 1413
9 - 16 1301 1527 - 1092
17 - 24 1178 1538 - 776

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Cashman, Hailey Heartland Fencing Academy E23 2073 1794.43
2 Fraser, Morgan Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1945 1669.44
3 Hu, Sophie Renaissance Fencing Club U 1949 1636.95
4 Yang, Olivia Queen City Fencers Club LLC U 1747 1366.91
5 Huang, Emma Renaissance Fencing Club U 1586 1135.44
6 Zhang, Selina Renaissance Fencing Club U 1521 1094.43
7 Liu, Sophia RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1484 993.55
8 Kagan, Natalie Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1413 930.25
9 Kim, Yuna Renaissance Fencing Club U 1527 902.06
10 LaLonde, Beatrice Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1311 824.22
11 Kim, Gia Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1365 694.55
12 Kashuba, Mila Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1213 664.64
13 Ma, Sophia U 1228 590.90
14 Fang, Savannah Renaissance Fencing Club U 1092 589.91
15 Smith, Samantha Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1239 559.43
16 Li, Claire Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1430 454.15
17 Shi, Cathy Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1481 391.85
18 Marenitch, Kara Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC U 1160 369.26
19 Evola, Ellie Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1454 284.69
20 Gong, Maggie Columbus International Fencing Academy U 893 40.59
21 Jiang, Mujing Renaissance Fencing Club U 1178 < 0
22 Huang, Cynthia Fencing Center Of Chicago U 776 < 0
23 Walsh, Ardella South YEL Fencing Alliance U 1538 < 0
24 Yu, Reecy Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 947 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!