Bill Starr 4th memorial RYC/RJCC

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Sunday, April 14, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Crossroads College Preparatory School - St Louis, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2037 2230 - 1815
5 - 8 1610 1701 - 1537
9 - 16 1413 1719 - 1066
17 - 25 1111 1425 - 939

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ozawa, Taishi Royal Arts Fencing Academy D24 2230 1936.16
2 Zhou, Justin The Fencers Academy U 2101 1745.89
3 McMillian, Harrison Heartland Fencing Academy U 2002 1572.66
4 Kagan, Noah Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1815 1449.88
5 Wenger, Rowan Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1701 1364.75
6 Symmank, Callen Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1650 1258.53
7 LINEBERRY, CADEN Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1554 1178.98
8 Wilson, Jacob Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1537 1111.19
9 Morales, Tycho RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1596 1097.52
10 Ferguson, Levi Heartland Fencing Academy U 1681 1087.81
11 Alva, Anmol Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1719 1061.24
12 DiFrank, Tae Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1335 857.99
13 Xu, Rambert The Fencers Academy U 1337 673.19
14 Kalina, Levi Iowa City Fencing Center U 1449 600.50
15 Cronk, Trevor Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1066 558.72
16 Fostervold, Castiel Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1118 489.93
17 Shah, Aadi Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1050 373.56
18 Ritter, Nathan D. Renaissance Fencing Club U 1029 372.25
19 Hildebrandt, Gerhard The Fencers Academy U 995 173.74
20 Chen, Evan Heartland Fencing Academy U 1051 < 0
21 Chen, Kyle Heartland Fencing Academy U 1425 < 0
22 Kotch, Brodie Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1068 < 0
23 Stamps, Jasper RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1270 < 0
24 Park, Nathan Heartland Fencing Academy U 1170 < 0
25 Flood, Moe Center for Blade Arts U 939 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!