Division 1/Parafencing National Championships + April NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Epee (V40ME)

Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 9:30 AM

Register

Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3477 3659 - 3238
5 - 8 3063 3331 - 2938
9 - 16 2458 3083 - 2025
17 - 26 1958 2590 - 1257

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Maczik, Adam Marx Fencing Academy A24 3659 3352.27
2 Zucker, Noah Cobra Fencing Club LLC A23 3563 3249.67
3 Mandoki, Sandor Halberstadt Fencers' Club B24 3447 3083.95
4 Rostal, Scott Twin Cities Fencing Club A23 3238 2885.11
5 Chandler, Paul East Bay Fencers Gym A24 3331 2832.65
6 Pho, Eric Fencers Club Inc. A23 3017 2724.56
7 Liou, Solomon Medeo Fencing Club A24 2966 2657.75
8 Carter, Austin Penta Olympic Fencing Club A24 2938 2642.38
9 Cheng, Thomas Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club A22 2922 2612.94
10 Stephan, Jens German Fencing Academy A23 3083 2553.84
11 Stock, Jordan Salle Auriol Seattle A23 2448 2152.81
12 Marsh, Timothy No Fear Fencing B21 2599 2046.12
13 Baranowski, Philip Denver Fencing Foundation C24 2453 1847.21
14 Shull, Marc Windy City Fencing-Chicago D23 2099 1723.49
15 Kim, Jeff Elite Fencing Academy (GA) C24 2037 1618.43
16 Kaskan, Peter Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC D23 2025 1598.57
17 Sloan, Ryan East Bay Fencers Gym D22 1945 1484.03
18 Reed, David Rain City Fencing Center C23 1863 1463.66
19 McNally, Thomas Culver Military Academy D21 2533 1347.49
20 Moret, Eric DC Fencers Club C23 1964 1165.22
21 Tomasi, John U 2421 1106.70
22 Lytle, Evan Escrime Du Lac E24 1996 947.65
23 Lin, Ching-Yang U 2590 883.48
24 Silkey, Jason Salle Auriol Seattle E23 1257 709.68
25 Powell, Troy Fencers Club Inc. D23 1274 69.71
26 Franger, Jeff Escrime Du Lac E24 1741 0.48

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!