Central Texas Pirate Clash RJCC/RYC - Region 5

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Saturday, May 18, 2024 at 11:00 AM

Register

Austin Sports Center - Cedar Park NEW DATE May 18/19 - Cedar Park, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2078 2314 - 1838
5 - 8 1793 1896 - 1718
9 - 16 1355 1606 - 1150
17 - 26 1485 2500 - 767

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 YU, BOWEN Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2314 2045.05
2 Yu, Ian Lone Star Fencing Center U 2209 1935.11
3 Li, Huangziyue Lone Star Fencing Center U 1952 1595.00
4 Lin, Alex Lone Star Fencing Center U 1838 1448.56
5 Roh, Jaden Globus Fencing Academy U 1799 1418.44
6 Siddamshetty, Ishaan Globus Fencing Academy U 1896 1380.09
7 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1718 1305.21
8 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1758 1287.84
9 Kamura, Kosei Globus Fencing Academy U 1606 1072.55
10 Mai, Ryan Lone Star Fencing Center U 1305 826.53
11 Chan, Troy Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1150 670.82
12 Thotakura, Sreyas Frisco Fencing Academy U 1294 628.60
13 Sra, Nawab Frisco Fencing Academy U 1445 600.59
14 Wang, Luke Globus Fencing Academy U 1383 476.95
15 Chen, Harrison Globus Fencing Academy U 1277 422.49
16 Nuthalapatii, Rishi Frisco Fencing Academy U 1381 379.33
17 Berube, Rush Globus Fencing Academy U 1470 228.49
18 Welch, Jackson Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC U 1451 214.77
19 Ganesh, Arav Frisco Fencing Academy U 984 47.78
20 Sosa, Cesar Fencing Institute Of Texas U 2500 < 0
21 Burla, Saiavaneesh Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC U 2500 < 0
22 Kang, Jayden Frisco Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
23 Shankar, Rahm Texas Sabre Academy U 940 < 0
24 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 767 < 0
25 Raj, Adithya Frisco Fencing Academy U 818 < 0
26 DUBEY, SHASWAT U 922 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!