San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 2 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 3 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
| 3 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 75% |
| 5 | MORROW Brenden | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 6 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 7 | LING Eddie | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 24% | 2% |
| 8 | NG Micah | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 9 | PORPORA Oliver | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 10 | WU Alber Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% | |
| 10 | LO Preston | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% | |
| 12 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 13 | ZHU Raymond | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 14 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | PARK Sangmin | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 16 | TULYAG Azim | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 17 | RAJ Jay | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | LI Richard | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 19 | DULAI Angad | - | - | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 20 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | SHEN Oliver | - | - | 7% | 30% | 44% | 19% | |
| 22 | CARVAJAL Josmar | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% |
| 23 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 24 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 2% | 18% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | LI Jonathan | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | YANG Charles | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | YUE Jackson | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 28 | ZHANG Graham | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 1% |
| 29 | HE Bourne | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | FU Bryan | 10% | 46% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | TALWALKAR Vedant | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | DANIEL Nikith | 15% | 52% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | DURBIN DJ | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 35 | RUMPLER Donovan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | DULAI Agam | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ARCARA Evan | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | GORDON William L. | 16% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | DE RIDDER Nathan | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SONG Matthew | 4% | 29% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | WONG Vansen | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 43 | BAUMAN Colin | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HE Ian | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LO Liam | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | ANDRADE Cedric | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | SHA Walter | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.