Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | |
| 2 | TRUBETSKI David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 6% | |
| 3 | LACZIN Mark R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% |
| 3 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 5 | BEAR Myles A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 65% | 18% |
| 6 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 6 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 37% | |
| 8 | ZAIDI Adil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 9 | SHEA William | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 10 | WOOD Ben | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 11 | BLAM Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 15% | 1% | |
| 12 | GORDON Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 13 | WITTIG Jonathon T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | |
| 14 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 3% | |
| 15 | BAYER John P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 16 | RUSANOV Oleg | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
| 17 | FADL Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 18 | GRAHAM Asa | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | XU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | SEDGLEY Samuel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | CANDELARIA Armando | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | ZAIDI Sohail | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 23 | MOORE Addisyn | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | IHRIE Greg H. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 25 | DONOHUE Peter | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | - | |
| 26 | MACKAY Ian | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SWANN Max | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 28 | GODIN Willis | 100% | 97% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 29 | NSUBUGA Jeffrey | 100% | 89% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | SELTZER Eve | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | MYERS Kenneth | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | CULP Joshua | 100% | 93% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | CHAO Pierre | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | NESTERUK Hope | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | WESTGATE Rebecca | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | JENKINS Michael | 100% | 81% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 36 | BERGMANN Beatrix | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | NAUGHTON Aidan | 100% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | STENSON Alyssa | 100% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.