USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Epee (V40ME)

Wednesday, July 6, 2022 at 2:00 PM

Register

Minneapolis, MN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3597 3795 - 3371
5 - 8 3360 3657 - 3218
9 - 16 2598 2922 - 2290
17 - 26 2086 2570 - 1598

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lichten, Keith East Bay Fencers Gym A21 3795 3400.51
2 Maczik, Adam Marx Fencing Academy A21 3659 3352.27
3 Zucker, Noah Cobra Fencing Club LLC A22 3563 3249.67
4 Makmatov, Vadim Salle Auriol Seattle A22 3371 3062.69
5 Allen, Graham East Bay Fencers Gym A22 3329 2945.10
6 Rostal, Scott Twin Cities Fencing Club A22 3238 2885.11
7 Bartlett, Jonathan New York Athletic Club A22 3218 2854.92
8 ElDarawani, Yasser Kaizen Academy LLC B22 3657 2751.90
9 Cheng, Thomas Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club B22 2922 2612.94
10 Yao, Shun True Focus Sports Academy A19 2844 2486.18
11 Springer, Michael Olympia Fencing Center A22 2679 2391.55
12 Stock, Jordan Salle Auriol Seattle B22 2448 2152.81
13 Gauvey, Ken DC Fencers Club E22 2570 2123.56
14 Gersen, Jacob Olympia Fencing Center D22 2290 1946.71
15 Hillstrom, Nathan Cabrillo Academy Of The Sword LLC B22 2313 1938.29
16 Iorio, Matthew Ocean State Fencing Club U 2722 1904.35
17 Chiz, Max New Orleans Fencers Club C19 2570 1901.38
18 Kent, David Rocky Mountain Fencing Academy C22 2158 1751.92
19 Harrell, D. Fox Marx Fencing Academy C21 2261 1734.33
20 Kim, Jeff Elite Fencing Academy (GA) E22 2037 1618.43
21 Lin, Kimball Maximum Fencing Club D21 2157 1583.58
22 Ozanne, Jeffrey Twin Cities Fencing Club D22 2085 1501.11
23 Santos, Felipe Olympia Fencing Center C21 1874 1492.90
24 Ferriere, Thomas Fortune Fencing U 2110 1478.72
25 Rhea, Eric Central Iowa Fencing Academy D19 2013 1402.32
26 Kuo, Michael Las Positas Fencing Center U 1598 1036.15

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!