AIC Summer Challenge RYC

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Friday, August 19, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Register

AIC FENCING CLUB - Sterling, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2641 2788 - 2546
5 - 8 2458 2470 - 2448
9 - 16 2206 2432 - 2034
17 - 28 1817 2500 - 1314

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lee, Brendan Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) E22 2788 2532.75
2 Tang, Albert OnTarget Fencing Club D22 2652 2398.31
3 Guth, Joseph Cleveland Fencing Academy E22 2577 2321.65
4 Huang, Eythan AIC Fencing Club D22 2546 2292.27
5 sheng, Dalton AIC Fencing Club C22 2470 2217.13
6 Yao, Bradley Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D22 2461 2206.13
7 Tang, August OnTarget Fencing Club C22 2453 2202.05
8 Tang, Alexander OnTarget Fencing Club E22 2448 2196.68
9 Zhao, Adam AIC Fencing Club U 2432 2179.89
10 Mao, Lucas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E21 2341 2092.68
11 Jiang, Bowang AIC Fencing Club U 2276 1983.08
12 Griffith McAllister, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 2226 1973.94
13 HE, Kyle AIC Fencing Club U 2177 1882.33
14 Lu, Nathan OnTarget Fencing Club U 2115 1794.92
15 Hua, Aaron AIC Fencing Club U 2050 1774.45
16 Yu, William AIC Fencing Club U 2034 1764.91
17 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club U 1955 1691.67
18 Harwood, Gray Greensboro Fencing Academy U 1941 1546.05
19 Zhang, Alex Invicta Sports U 1823 1494.28
20 Stradomskyi, Klim Academies Of Fencing In Baltimore E22 2147 1461.13
21 Harper, Wesley Tidewater Fencing Club U 1936 1447.09
22 Zaidi, Adil OnTarget Fencing Club U 1726 1406.47
23 Li, Lianhan AIC Fencing Club E22 1810 1393.74
24 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team E22 1633 1209.53
25 Tseng, Lucas AIC Fencing Club U 1476 1059.52
26 Pan, Edwin AIC Fencing Club U 1546 1004.80
27 Liu, Robert AIC Fencing Club U 1314 888.22
28 Zhao, Eric AIC Fencing Club U 2500 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!