Fairfax Challenge Fall RYC/RJCC & Y8 (Non-Regional)

Cadet Men’s Saber (CDTMS)

Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center - Hall A & B - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2787 3061 - 2537
5 - 8 2363 2444 - 2197
9 - 16 2063 2205 - 1882
17 - 28 1724 1938 - 1351

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Su, Landon Miracle Fencing Club C22 2959 2699.47
2 An, Chihun D22 3061 2374.61
3 Yan, William Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 2591 2327.69
4 So, Preston Nellya Fencers U 2537 2279.57
5 Deck, Tyson Forge Fencing Teams D22 2441 2184.56
6 Etin, Ari Forge Fencing Teams D19 2444 2108.52
7 Hotha, Nikhil Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E21 2371 2087.95
8 Lin, Felix Miracle Fencing Club U 2197 1927.80
9 Gauvey, Kieran Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E22 2205 1924.95
10 Mol, Justin Forge Fencing Teams U 2204 1816.27
11 wang, Max Capital Fencing Academy U 2026 1759.11
12 Hall, Noah Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 2003 1714.75
13 Olalia-Napier, Gabriel Capital Fencing Academy U 2186 1707.86
14 Walke, Devin Capital Fencing Academy E21 2095 1682.26
15 Xia, Eric Platinum Fencing Academy E22 1906 1530.47
16 Shankar, Karthik Capital Fencing Academy E22 1882 1496.73
17 Markowitz, Jonathan Nova Fencing Club U 1862 1478.88
18 Weinstein, Nate Capital Fencing Academy U 1854 1422.37
19 Fruth, Evan Forge Fencing Teams U 1750 1391.12
20 Manescu, Miron Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 1748 1369.45
21 Lichterman, Jakub Capital Fencing Academy U 1568 1090.20
22 Card, Seamus Miracle Fencing Club U 1751 954.64
23 Sebastian, Nicholas Middle Tennessee Fencing Club U 1723 739.44
24 Kirchmaier, Charlie Miracle Fencing Club U 1351 734.72
25 Kim, Minhyeok U 1938 534.20
26 Kim, Taeho Unattached U 1737 432.56
27 Wang, Henry Capital Fencing Academy U 1667 < 0
28 Alpan, Arda U 1743 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!