San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 16% | |
| 2 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 3 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | BLINKOV Andrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 6 | CHEN Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | |
| 7 | FALLICK Ozzie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 7% |
| 8 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 9 | KHAVANDI Soheil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 10 | PARKEY Jack O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
| 10 | HASNAH Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 12 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 13 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 14 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | YEARLING Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | ANDERSON Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | MAHONEY Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 19 | CHUPKIN Nikolas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | GRIFFIN Nicholas D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | FAN Wengronghao | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | FLORES Peter D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | BAILEY Nate | 100% | 97% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | ELLIS Steven | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | ALKIN Isaac | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 28 | PROCHAZKA Archer R. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | HAGA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | FEDKIW Olivier | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 35 | HODGES Calvin | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 36 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | YEARLING Ethan | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | DHANANI Zain | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | CHANG Lawrence | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.