Nashville Challenge RYC/RJCC

Cadet Women’s Foil (CDTWF)

Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:00 PM

Register

Mid-TN Expo - Murfreesbor, TN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2750 2881 - 2666
5 - 8 2304 2408 - 2150
9 - 16 1987 2172 - 1745
17 - 26 1415 1715 - 853

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Li, Sophia Birmingham Fencing Club B22 2881 2622.25
2 Nikolic, Alexandra Naples Fencing Academy C22 2766 2502.22
3 Park, Lina Auburn Fencing Club U 2686 2424.99
4 Marisi, Gianna Lang Fencing Academy E22 2666 2400.22
5 Vaughan, Norah Birmingham Fencing Club D22 2408 2140.43
6 Park, Zena Auburn Fencing Club U 2337 2074.11
7 Hafez, Tahiyah Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E22 2320 2062.74
8 Wang, Sophia Epic Fencing Club E22 2150 1889.51
9 Lin, Ju-An Adrianne Birmingham Fencing Club D22 2172 1845.54
10 Gao, Anne Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 2034 1741.68
11 Eveland, Zoe Nashville Academy of Fencing D22 2019 1730.55
12 Landman, Charlotte Lang Fencing Academy E22 2147 1665.31
13 Liu, Elinda Epic Fencing Club U 1967 1638.44
14 CHOI, JULIE Auburn Fencing Club U 1974 1623.79
15 Hoogstra, Lucy Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1841 1544.11
16 Brown, Lily Birmingham Fencing Club U 1745 1354.94
17 Budko, Julia Williamson County Fencing Club U 1715 1311.34
18 Tan, Isabella Lang Fencing Academy U 1512 1118.35
19 Gadiyaram, Sushama Orlando Fencing Academy U 1512 1109.02
20 Kaiser, Katherine The Fencers Academy U 1614 1097.43
21 Muller, Van Lotus Fencing Academy E22 1328 837.65
22 Yau, Katie Epic Fencing Club U 1577 351.01
23 van Drimmelen, Zoe Memphis University School Fencing Team U 1570 15.27
24 Foster, Alexia Williamson County Fencing Club U 1603 2.89
25 Fromal, Lily Lotus Fencing Academy U 866 < 0
26 Fromal, Aylee Lotus Fencing Academy U 853 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!