Nashville Challenge RYC/RJCC

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Register

Mid-TN Expo - Murfreesbor, TN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2357 2448 - 2226
5 - 8 1942 2066 - 1739
9 - 16 1598 1859 - 1305
17 - 24 1307 1742 - 855

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Tang, Alexander OnTarget Fencing Club E22 2448 2196.68
2 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C22 2400 2139.88
3 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club U 2354 2083.73
4 Griffith McAllister, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E22 2226 1973.94
5 LIM, EUNSEONG Auburn Fencing Club U 2066 1794.39
6 Marisi, Gabriel Salle D'Armes Bosco U 2007 1743.93
7 Qian, Henry Epic Fencing Club U 1954 1682.95
8 Zeng, Albert Baker County Fencing Club U 1739 1455.57
9 Koe, Declan Fioretto Fencing Academy U 1737 1422.57
10 Shaw, Spencer Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 1688 1407.21
11 Zhou, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1671 1328.66
12 Hearn, Asa C. Birmingham Fencing Club U 1859 1149.92
13 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1305 833.12
14 Xing, Samuel Williamson County Fencing Club U 1738 790.47
15 Lester, Ashton Auburn Fencing Club U 1483 698.41
16 Choi, Junwoo Auburn Fencing Club U 1307 605.79
17 Newton, Zeke Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1497 502.97
18 Zhang, Justin Epic Fencing Club U 1293 327.72
19 Jones, Gideon Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1324 202.79
20 Robertson, Liam Birmingham Fencing Club U 855 149.49
21 Bridges, Henry Birmingham Fencing Club U 1140 103.97
22 Webb, Elliott Williamson County Fencing Club U 1308 93.87
23 Field, Zachary Williamson County Fencing Club U 1742 < 0
24 Daniels, Isaiah Williamson County Fencing Club U 1294 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!