Midwest ROC (DV1A, DV2, VET) & RJCC

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Sunday, May 19, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2362 2577 - 2167
5 - 8 2000 2118 - 1879
9 - 16 1730 1820 - 1538
17 - 22 1196 1478 - 855

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Guth, Joseph Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC B24 2577 2321.65
2 Li, Samuel Rain City Fencing Center C24 2388 2132.54
3 Twemlow, Sacha Bronzeville Fencing Academy D24 2316 2033.08
4 Chuang, Oscar Fencing Center Of Chicago D24 2167 1909.38
5 VanOyen, Dominick Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D24 2118 1832.71
6 Kue, Temujin Grand Rapids Fencing Academy C24 2050 1754.79
7 Wei Jr, Shan Pittsburgh Fencers Club U 1954 1649.18
8 LIU, Yinhong RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 1879 1556.81
9 Mavani, Krishna Renaissance Fencing Club D24 1818 1490.98
10 Kagan, Noah Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1815 1449.88
11 Fraser, Rhys Bluegrass Fencers' Club E24 1773 1448.98
12 Nazario, Dominic Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D24 1774 1357.87
13 Holliday, Christopher Mansfield-Scott RedStar Fencing Club Chicago E24 1820 1355.97
14 Moldoveanu, Roman Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. E24 1629 1173.96
15 Zhang, Hanson Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1538 1145.53
16 Jarcho, Beckett Center for Blade Arts U 1673 1044.68
17 Herrera, Xavier Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1478 1043.97
18 Ruby, Asher Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1412 862.85
19 Davis, Benjamin Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1237 623.35
20 Kolacki, Gabriel Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1038 482.54
21 LAMBERT, Parker Stratford Fencing Club U 1153 < 0
22 Drawz, Chase U 855 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!