Midwest ROC (DV1A, DV2, VET) & RJCC

Veteran Men’s Epee (VETME)

Sunday, May 19, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3023 3260 - 2810
5 - 8 2652 2857 - 2270
9 - 16 2310 2772 - 1780
17 - 25 1689 2006 - 1014

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Snider, Jeffrey DC Fencers Club A24 3260 2966.44
2 Glass, Timothy Ataba Fencing Club A20 3071 2753.58
3 Karolak, Dale Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy A22 2951 2632.67
4 Kent, Dwain Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. B22 2810 2509.38
5 Wilkinson, Derek On Target Fencing Team A23 2857 2473.55
6 Wheeler, Mark Windy City Fencing-Chicago B22 2717 2380.19
7 Evert, Todd Royal Arts Fencing Academy C24 2765 2095.77
8 Swanson, Dave Ataba Fencing Club B21 2270 1959.51
9 Oberly, Nicholas Center for Blade Arts B23 2772 1807.22
10 Glennon, Michael Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E23 2747 1740.66
11 Thoreson, Gary US Modern Pentathlon Assoc. E23 2096 1454.15
12 Elterman, Lev Windy City Fencing-Chicago D23 1879 1377.89
13 McNally, Thomas Culver Military Academy D21 2533 1347.47
14 Treanor, Donald Fencing Center Of Chicago U 2018 1327.02
15 Tierney, Luke Iowa City Fencing Center C23 1780 1305.13
16 Vargas, Colby Iowa City Fencing Center C23 2655 1063.26
17 Castellanos, Rene Fencing Center Of Chicago E24 1683 926.17
18 St. George, David Crimson Blades Fencing Academy E21 1743 813.57
19 Siedow, Jeffrey Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1621 713.66
20 Cannon, Carroll Columbus International Fencing Academy U 1995 525.66
21 Jorgensen, Jay Sioux City Fencing Club E21 1775 429.99
22 Lebihan, Frank Windy City Fencing-Chicago E24 2006 420.66
23 Stone, Ken Twin Cities Fencing Club E23 1014 11.32
24 Franger, Jeff Escrime Du Lac E24 1741 0.48
25 Vais, Bruno Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1619 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!