Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | 9% | 40% | 42% | 8% |
| 2 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 18% |
| 3 | BERNDT Camryn | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 3 | MARTIN Sloan | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 28% |
| 5 | BOIKE Lucille | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 6 | LIN Athena | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | LISKA Sofia | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 8 | KNAPP Isabella | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 9 | KAGAN Natalie | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% |
| 10 | HAN Lucia | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 11 | LIANG Jasmine | 4% | 40% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 12 | RUSH Tara | 36% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.