Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | |
2 | ELDARAWANI Yasser M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
3 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 9% | |
3 | LICHTEN Keith H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
5 | MAKMATOV Vadim | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
6 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
7 | ROSTAL Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
8 | MACZIK Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
9 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
10 | ALLEN Graham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
11 | YAO Shun | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 1% | |
12 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
13 | IORIO Matthew | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
14 | RHEA Eric L. | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
15 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
16 | KUO Michael | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
17 | STOCK Jordan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
18 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
19 | HARRELL D. Fox | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
20 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
21 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
22 | LIN Kimball | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - | |
23 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
24 | CHIZ Max H. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
25 | KENT IV David | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
26 | FERRIERE Thomas | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.