Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NAVARRO Ava B. | D V V V V | V V V V V | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 2 | SLACKMAN Valerie | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | ALDADAH Huda M. | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | KIM Diane E. | V D D V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 5 | NI Emma | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | KULKARNI Diya | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | LEE Olive | V D V D V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 9 | LIN Jessica Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 10 | LONG Cindy | V D V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 11 | YOON Julia J. | D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 12 | YEE-WADSWORTH Sofia L. | D V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 13 | COBERT Helen G. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 14 | SHI Angela L. | V D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 15 | LIN Julia L. | V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 16 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | D D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 17 | GILLIS Alexandra G. | V V V D D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 18 | WILLIAMS Claudine S. | V V V V D D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 19 | KANG Dahyun | V V V D D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | BENATER Lauren | V V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | ZHAO Yingying | V V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 23 | CHAN Elizabeth | V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | LIN Katie Y. | V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 24 | HUH Anna | D V D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | TOLBA Salma | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | PYO Yunice | V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 28 | SHAO Ariel | D V D D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 29 | RABEL Brenna V. | D D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 30 | YAO Jillian | D D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 31 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | SMUK Daria A. | V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 33 | SZEWC Alexandra | D V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 34 | CORDERO Allison | D D D V V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 35 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 36 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 37 | ROWLAND May | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 38 | MOK Chloe R. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 39 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.