The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

NEUSFA 2022 Pomme De Terre

E & Under Men's Épée

Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) D V D V V V V V V V V 4.2 4 -0.2
2 TORRES Gianni V D V D D D V V V V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
3 BEALS Alden V D V V V D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
3 DJONOUMA Toyohm D V D V D V V V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
5 LIU Shuang V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
6 FENG Du V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
7 VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas V D V V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
8 MATEI Daniel V D V V V D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
9 XIE Brandon V V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
10 ZOU Xianyang D V V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
11 KUBATIN Anton V. D D V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
12 GRAYSON Joshua V V D V D D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
13 SPRINGER Elijah D D V V D V V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
14 MACNEILL Owen D V V D V D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
15 JIANG Ryan V V D D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
16 VELAMAKANNI Advith D D D D D V V D 2.0 0 -2.0
17 PETROV Niki A. V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
18 WANG Justin D V V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
19 EANG Brynner V V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
20 OSTIGUY Cameron V V V V D D D 4.4 4 -0.4
21 SMEDLEY Drew N. D V D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
22 STEIN Philip V V V D D V D 2.1 4 +1.9
23 MOELDERS Moritz V D V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
24 BELLIVEAU Emmett S. V V D V D D 3.9 3 -0.9
25 MILGRAM Aaron V V V D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
26 GILLER Augustus V V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
27 LIU Jeremiah W. D V D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
28 ROSENBLUM Addison J. V V D D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
29 TISKA Jack V D D D D V V D 0.9 2 +1.1
30 JACKSON Nicholas D D D D V V D 1.9 1 -0.9
31 MURDOCH ROY Charlie D D V D D D V D 2.8 1 -1.8
32 ZHANG Roland D D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
33 BUNSZEL Connor V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
34 HARMON Philip R. D D D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
35 MODRUSAN Lukas V V D D V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
36 BURNHAM Mark D D V D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
37 TEREB Daniel D D D V V D 0.9 2 +1.1
38 BUTTS Brendan V V D D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
39 LEVANDOWSKI Lakota D D D V D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
40 TERRANOVA Jobin V D V D D D D 3.3 2 -1.3
41 RITTERSHAUS Bryce D D D V D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
42 CARMODY Corneilius D D V D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
43 MELCHER Charles D D V D D D 3.5 1 -2.5
44 CHU Wenxi D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
45 CHAPMAN Brynmor D V D D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
46 MASSE Jack D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.