The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Junior Olympic Championships

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 1:00 PM

Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KIM Nicholas W. - - - - 3% 28% 69%
2 HUTH Mitchell - - - 1% 12% 44% 43%
3 BAS Liam - - - - 5% 30% 64%
3 LO Conrad - - - 1% 15% 84%
5 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - - 3% 27% 70%
6 GRAHAM Roy J. - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
7 WU Alexander - - - 1% 9% 40% 51%
8 DORAN Wesley C. - - 3% 17% 40% 33% 6%
9 YANG Luao - - - 1% 9% 38% 53%
10 BURKE Spencer W. - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
11 UM Ethan A. - - - - 4% 28% 68%
12 BANERJEE ANUP - - 1% 8% 30% 44% 17%
13 SONG Leonardo T. - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
14 KAO Castor T. - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
15 SINGH Dayaal - - - 3% 16% 43% 38%
16 GODZHIK Zachary - - - 4% 22% 45% 28%
17 JEON Caleb A. - - - 1% 8% 37% 55%
18 FUKUDA Renzo K. - - - 3% 16% 42% 40%
19 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 1% 12% 43% 44%
20 LIN Dashiell - - 3% 19% 48% 30%
21 FU Samuel Y. - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
22 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) - - - 2% 14% 42% 42%
22 JAIN Aditya - - 4% 19% 38% 31% 9%
24 CHEN Allen - - - - 5% 33% 61%
25 GOOR Julian - - 4% 22% 44% 30%
25 CHIN Julian S. - - 4% 35% 46% 14%
27 ZHANG Andy W. - - - 1% 9% 38% 53%
28 CHEN Andrew - - - 1% 9% 37% 52%
28 BAE Kevin - 1% 6% 22% 36% 28% 8%
30 DAI Jonathan T. - - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
31 ZHAI Jeffrey - - 2% 14% 39% 37% 8%
32 DIERKS Kian - - - 5% 28% 49% 17%
33 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. - - - 1% 9% 43% 48%
34 PELOSKY Zack B. - - - 3% 21% 50% 26%
35 LI Richard - - - 1% 9% 36% 55%
36 LEE Aidan - 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 7%
37 KWON Ethan - - - 2% 13% 42% 44%
38 DETERING Julian - - 1% 20% 48% 28% 3%
38 LOVIN Vlad - 1% 12% 34% 37% 14% 1%
40 ZELTSER Lawrence M. - - 2% 17% 41% 35% 5%
41 SUNG Chang-Han S. - - 4% 20% 40% 30% 6%
42 LISONDRA Niko - 4% 21% 40% 28% 6% -
43 DOCTOR Aidan L. - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
44 BRUK Peter J. - - - 2% 16% 47% 35%
45 LUH Ethan K. - - 2% 15% 40% 36% 8%
46 SHA Yi Peng - - 1% 10% 33% 42% 14%
46 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 3%
48 ONIK Elijah T. - - - 1% 10% 40% 49%
49 TSIMIKLIS Yanni - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
50 ORVANANOS Jorge - 5% 30% 44% 20% 1%
51 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - 6% 32% 43% 16% 2%
52 FREEDMAN Samuel E. - - 2% 13% 43% 36% 6%
53 LI Owen - - - 4% 20% 46% 30%
54 DU Samuel R. - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 4%
54 JI Aidan Y. - 3% 17% 35% 32% 12% 1%
56 OH SEAN - - 6% 29% 43% 20% 2%
57 CANLAS Nathan - 1% 8% 28% 38% 22% 4%
58 LEE Jacob J - 1% 7% 26% 41% 22% 4%
59 TSAI Max W. - 5% 25% 40% 24% 5% -
60 WU Jerry Z. - - 5% 26% 42% 23% 4%
61 COSTELLO Chaissen F. - - 2% 15% 36% 35% 12%
62 COELHO Cristiano P. - - 1% 11% 40% 40% 8%
63 HOBSON Aaron K. - - 1% 11% 40% 41% 7%
64 VAZQUEZ Zander - 2% 12% 34% 39% 14%
65 LI Matthew - 1% 12% 37% 38% 11% 1%
66 RUSADZE Nickolas - - 5% 22% 45% 28%
67 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - - 3% 19% 52% 26%
68 SONG Aiden S. - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
68 VALOUEV Aleksey - - 6% 37% 42% 13% 1%
70 YU Anders - - 1% 11% 35% 40% 12%
71 CHENG Jonathan - - 2% 15% 40% 37% 6%
72 LIU Eric Y. - - 6% 28% 43% 19% 2%
73 KLOTZ Isaiah 3% 22% 39% 27% 8% 1% -
74 WOO Christian - - 6% 26% 41% 24% 4%
75 ROSE Ben - 4% 18% 37% 31% 9% 1%
76 LI Eric - - 7% 41% 42% 9%
77 KIM Ryan Y. - - 6% 29% 42% 20% 2%
78 BING Charles - - 1% 6% 28% 47% 17%
79 GAO William - - 2% 18% 41% 33% 5%
80 SIU Aiden - - 3% 18% 42% 31% 5%
81 JITTAN daniel - 2% 11% 31% 38% 16% 2%
82 WYMAN Julian - - 4% 23% 42% 26% 4%
83 FORTUNE Alexander J. - 1% 8% 32% 39% 17% 2%
84 TSAY Jeremy M. - 1% 8% 29% 40% 19% 3%
85 HAN Lawrence - 1% 19% 42% 30% 8% 1%
86 NUNNINK Phillip W. - - 1% 9% 32% 43% 16%
87 FOGELSON Frederick J. - - - 4% 22% 46% 28%
88 MILLER Aidan A. 1% 10% 32% 35% 18% 4% -
89 MUSHER Benjamin J. - 1% 11% 38% 37% 12% 1%
89 AHN Jun - - - 3% 20% 48% 29%
91 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - 5% 26% 43% 23% 2%
92 LIN Michael - 1% 13% 34% 35% 15% 2%
93 NAGER Noah - - 3% 17% 41% 32% 6%
93 TANG Owen S. - 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 3%
95 GATZA Logan - 1% 9% 32% 39% 17% 2%
96 LIN James G. - 5% 23% 39% 26% 6%
97 FUKUDA Alessio R. - 1% 7% 28% 43% 21%
98 CULLIVAN Justice - - 2% 16% 47% 35%
99 TRAUGOT Owen G. 3% 19% 39% 29% 9% 1%
100 KIM Yonjae - - - 5% 27% 48% 20%
101 KIM Jackson - 1% 9% 45% 36% 9% -
101 MYERS Dean 2% 15% 36% 35% 11% 1% -
103 MURUHIN Yaroslav - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
104 TEH Ryan 5% 29% 40% 20% 4% - -
104 KNIZHNIK David - 7% 29% 40% 20% 4% -
106 LEE Jacob - 2% 19% 42% 29% 7% -
107 SISINNI Riccardo - 10% 35% 38% 15% 2% -
108 SEAL Maximus R. 2% 18% 39% 31% 9% 1% -
109 ELKOUSY Laith H. 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 5% -
110 HARRIS Otto 1% 22% 42% 28% 7% 1% -
111 CAPRA Ethan 10% 36% 36% 15% 3% - -
112 LI Raphael C. - - - 5% 22% 43% 29%
113 CHUNG Yeongbin - 2% 11% 33% 41% 13% 1%
114 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. - 1% 7% 24% 39% 26% 4%
115 GUERRA Gabriel H. 2% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
116 SMITH Grant D. 3% 43% 40% 13% 2% - -
116 SEEDS Edward T. 1% 10% 37% 37% 13% 2% -
118 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. - 2% 22% 43% 27% 6% -
119 MEJIA MATTHEW D. - 4% 29% 45% 21% 1%
120 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden 1% 11% 41% 36% 9% 1%
121 KIM Andrew J. - 1% 6% 24% 39% 25% 5%
122 KIM Derek A. - 2% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3%
123 MIN Eric - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
124 CHI Alexander - - 5% 33% 44% 16% 2%
125 LEE Lukas - 3% 32% 43% 19% 3% -
126 REYES Omar - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
126 DESHMUKH Arjun 4% 20% 36% 28% 11% 2% -
128 FINNEY Lorenz 3% 25% 40% 25% 7% 1% -
129 NG Kenneth 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
130 MENG Zhaoyi 7% 28% 39% 21% 5% -
131 PALMA Matthew Dominic - 3% 23% 45% 27% 2%
132 LI Arvin - 5% 27% 43% 21% 4% -
132 MA Andrew 1% 8% 28% 37% 22% 5% -
134 SICHITIU Alexander - - 2% 12% 35% 40% 10%
135 WILLIAMS Connor J. - 3% 21% 41% 29% 6% -
135 PO Oliver - 4% 25% 40% 25% 6% -
137 PARK Sky 2% 20% 42% 30% 6% - -
138 DANKAR Neel - - 3% 17% 36% 34% 10%
139 FLYNN Ian - 4% 27% 39% 23% 6% -
140 LI Avery Peihong - 3% 19% 39% 31% 8% 1%
141 LE Jacob W. 1% 7% 27% 39% 21% 4% -
142 DAVIDSON Elliot 1% 12% 37% 34% 14% 2% -
143 PAE Brian L. 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
144 BALDWIN Benjamin 22% 70% 8% < 1% - - -
144 SHAPIRO Leon 13% 55% 27% 5% - - -
146 OH Jaden - 17% 45% 30% 7% 1% -
147 LI Samuel 3% 25% 43% 25% 4% - -
148 HOOSHI Dylan M. - - < 1% 9% 41% 50%
149 BERK Theodore 1% 9% 29% 39% 19% 3%
150 KETTELLE John 20% 60% 19% 1% - -
151 TSAO Lukas 2% 21% 58% 17% 2% -
152 DINSAY Kristjan 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% -
153 WANG mason - 4% 35% 41% 17% 3% -
154 LIM Lance Jeremiah - 11% 64% 22% 2% - -
155 KRYLTSOV Michael - 3% 18% 41% 30% 7% -
156 KAPOOR Aayan 34% 44% 19% 4% - - -
157 SHEN Owen 2% 16% 38% 33% 10% 1% -
158 PAI Lakshan K. - 4% 27% 40% 23% 5% -
159 YEE Johnathan 7% 31% 41% 18% 3% - -
160 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 1% 10% 33% 37% 16% 3% -
160 GONZALEZ Matthew 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
162 ANDERSON Jacob 8% 34% 37% 17% 4% - -
162 KIM Aiden 3% 21% 44% 26% 6% - -
164 SIMA Congyu Josh - 3% 20% 40% 29% 6% -
165 GOGOI Vir K. - 3% 20% 41% 29% 7% -
166 SANTOS Carlos R. 4% 24% 41% 25% 5% - -
167 BATRA Dev 9% 39% 44% 8% - - -
168 BOUCHARD Kai 29% 49% 20% 3% - - -
169 LIPPMAN Sam - 6% 41% 39% 13% 2% -
170 HSIAO Nicholas 1% 23% 43% 26% 6% 1% -
171 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 4% 26% 41% 23% 5% - -
172 BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. 6% 31% 40% 19% 4% - -
173 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden 6% 31% 40% 19% 4% - -
173 WU Michael 7% 31% 39% 19% 3% - -
175 EDWARDS Maxon 26% 49% 22% 3% - - -
176 PARK Gabriel 12% 40% 34% 12% 2% - -
177 WU Alistair 20% 54% 22% 3% - -
178 HUANG Alston 39% 49% 11% 1% - -
179 NGUYEN Liam 18% 43% 30% 9% 1% -
180 WECHSLER Jacob 1% 8% 28% 39% 20% 4% -
180 DEDENBACH Joseph 1% 24% 42% 26% 6% 1% -
182 ZHENG zhe 1% 7% 26% 38% 22% 5% -
183 BERNABE Rafael 20% 44% 29% 7% 1% - -
184 WACHTEL Oliver 33% 48% 17% 2% - - -
185 WU Lucas 2% 23% 43% 27% 5% - -
185 QUINTERO Julian 29% 51% 17% 2% - - -
187 WANG Julang 49% 39% 11% 1% - - -
188 BAEK David 1% 10% 39% 37% 12% 1% -
189 KHER Roan 7% 28% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
190 MA Bryant 1% 9% 35% 40% 14% 2% -
191 SANCHEZ Emanuel 19% 46% 27% 7% 1% - -
192 TALASILA Arush 50% 42% 7% 1% - - -
193 WOHLERS Trevor 1% 45% 41% 12% 1% - -
194 GIDDENS James Oliver 54% 38% 8% 1% - - -
195 BHARGAVA Aayush 4% 22% 43% 25% 6% 1% -
196 BLAM Matthew 17% 50% 30% 3% - - -
197 MARTIN William 29% 61% 10% 1% - - -
198 TKACHUK Daniel 31% 59% 9% - - - -
199 CHOI Simon 64% 32% 4% - - - -
200 YOUNGBLOOD Woody C. - 19% 40% 30% 9% 1% -
201 HIGGASON Hugh 30% 59% 10% 1% - - -
202 TANG Albert 34% 44% 19% 3% - -
203 FINLEY Dylan 16% 40% 32% 11% 1% -
204 BOYKO Miles 42% 41% 15% 2% - - -
205 OLSON Emerson 15% 40% 34% 10% 1% - -
206 JOHN AYI Neville Pascal 64% 33% 4% - - -
207 SUBRAMANIAN Johnathan 18% 56% 22% 3% - - -
208 MURDOCH ROY Charlie 55% 38% 7% - - -
209 SUTHERLAND Nicholas 15% 42% 32% 9% 1% - -
210 LI Lianhao 39% 49% 11% 1% - -
211 HUSSAIN Ibrahim 30% 45% 21% 4% - - -
211 ORNELAS Matteo 43% 45% 11% 1% - - -
211 SCOTT Chase 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
214 ARMSTRONG Elijah 68% 28% 4% - - - -
214 BLACK Zachary 72% 24% 3% - - - -
214 EDISON Ansel 43% 43% 13% 2% - - -
217 BARTON Matthew P. 21% 47% 25% 6% 1% - -
217 SLOUGH Sean 40% 42% 16% 3% - - -
217 SIDDIQI Amman 96% 4% - - - - -
217 SRINIVASAN Vedant 16% 50% 28% 6% 1% - -
217 IRISH Thomas 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
217 EXNICIOS Rex 47% 42% 10% - - - -
217 BREWNER Ethan 86% 13% 1% - - - -
224 BARTON Luke J. 16% 41% 33% 9% 1% - -
224 SCHIEK Harrison 35% 46% 17% 2% - - -
224 EVANS noah 42% 41% 15% 2% - - -
224 MORRIS Luke 60% 38% 2% - - - -
228 BROOKS Matthew 68% 29% 3% - - - -
229 SPAULDING Wilson 87% 13% 1% - - - -
229 HOLCOMB Alexander 94% 6% - - - - -
231 SCHUMANN Benjamin 62% 36% 2% - - - -
232 DALVA Michael 59% 39% 3% - - - -
232 GOLDEN Marshall 67% 30% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.