The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Division I and Parafencing Nat'l Championships & April NAC

Cadet Women's Saber

Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 2:00 PM

Charlotte, NC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. - - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
2 SHOMAN Jenna - - - - 3% 24% 73%
3 FREEDMAN Janna N. - - - 2% 15% 41% 41%
3 KRASTEV Minna - - 1% 13% 43% 43%
5 DUCKETT Madison - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
6 ANDRES Charmaine G. - - 1% 5% 22% 43% 30%
7 NATH Trisha - 3% 14% 34% 36% 14%
8 JEONG Katie 1% 6% 19% 32% 28% 13% 2%
9 SHEARER Natalie E. - - 4% 20% 38% 30% 8%
10 LIU Sophie - 1% 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
11 PAUL Lila - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 14%
12 BALAKUMARAN Maya - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 6%
13 KER Grace - - 2% 9% 27% 40% 23%
14 ANTHONY Alexia B. - 2% 12% 33% 35% 16% 2%
15 YANG Lea 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
16 HUNG Anna - 6% 22% 37% 28% 8%
17 YUAN Greta - 1% 5% 18% 36% 31% 9%
18 HILD Nisha - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 19%
19 CHIN Sophia J. - - 3% 13% 35% 39% 10%
20 KIM Marley I. - 1% 9% 25% 36% 23% 6%
21 JUNG Irene - - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11%
22 WU Helen 1% 7% 22% 35% 26% 8% 1%
23 LEE Hannah - 1% 6% 27% 47% 20%
24 WIGGERS Susan Q. - - 1% 8% 26% 40% 24%
25 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. - 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 1%
26 GHAYALOD reya - - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
27 SINHA Anika - 3% 16% 32% 32% 15% 3%
28 CHANG Audrey 1% 15% 33% 32% 15% 4% -
29 MARYASH Samantha - 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% -
30 HWANG Gabriela M. - 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8%
31 TONG Jessie 1% 10% 28% 34% 20% 6% 1%
32 MCKEE Brynnley 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 6% 1%
33 LI Amanda C. - - - 6% 33% 61%
34 NGUYEN Siena 5% 20% 33% 27% 12% 3% < 1%
35 JOHNSON Dagny L. - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
35 SHI Cathleen - 2% 9% 24% 34% 25% 7%
37 FANG Victoria W. - 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 5%
38 CHEN Ashley - 3% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
39 YOUNG Charlotte G. 5% 24% 40% 25% 6% -
40 JOHNSON Lydia 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5%
41 YANG Ashley M. - - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
42 LIGH Erenei J. - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 5%
42 LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 4% -
44 WEI Vivian W. - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 1%
45 YANG Angelina LeLe - 1% 7% 25% 40% 25% 3%
46 BEVACQUA Aria F. - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
47 VADASZ Ibla P. - - 2% 10% 28% 39% 21%
48 LUKER Sophia - 4% 17% 33% 30% 13% 2%
49 BARNOVITZ Maya 1% 11% 34% 38% 14% 1%
50 MAKLIN Sofia - 4% 20% 37% 30% 9%
51 DAI Olivia 9% 34% 38% 16% 2% -
52 TSUI Natalie - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 2%
53 FESTA Carina 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
54 ALCEBAR Kayla - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
55 ERIKSON Kira R. - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 4%
55 WEI JoyAnn 8% 29% 36% 20% 6% 1% -
57 HUCHWAJDA Pola 14% 40% 32% 11% 2% -
58 NATHANSON Sammy E. - 2% 12% 35% 42% 10%
59 LU Elaine - 1% 6% 18% 33% 31% 11%
60 NAYAK Esha 2% 16% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
61 MANN Sophia J. 2% 20% 42% 27% 8% 1% -
62 SO Catelyn 1% 8% 23% 32% 24% 9% 1%
63 GRAFF Sophie - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
64 HE Lizbeth 2% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
65 BAWA Anahat 12% 34% 34% 16% 4% - -
66 LEE Sophia - 4% 16% 33% 31% 14% 2%
67 KANTIPUDI Shrika 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2% -
68 DENG Brooke 2% 12% 30% 33% 18% 5% -
69 PANIGRAHI Kingsley 22% 40% 28% 9% 2% - -
70 CHEN Kevy 9% 32% 38% 18% 3% -
71 FEIG Sela 4% 21% 39% 28% 7% -
72 CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
73 CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. 2% 12% 30% 34% 19% 5% -
74 LAGOON Miriam 14% 42% 32% 10% 1% - -
75 FLATT Sophia 7% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
76 WANG Zidan 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
77 REN Xinling 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
78 LO JOCELYN 42% 41% 14% 2% - - -
79 LI Alexis 45% 41% 12% 2% - - -
80 YAO Rainie 35% 43% 18% 3% - -
81 YOUNG Audrey 8% 32% 39% 18% 3% -
82 LIM Jaslene 6% 23% 34% 25% 10% 2% -
83 YU Zhiang 7% 24% 34% 24% 9% 2% -
84 CARTER Keely 65% 29% 5% - - - -
85 SHINCHUK Ellisha 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
86 FANG sophie 16% 37% 32% 13% 3% - -
87 TUNG Renee 17% 41% 31% 10% 1% - -
88 MANSPERGER Leena - 4% 17% 33% 31% 14% 2%
88 NAYAK Anika 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
90 HUAI Delilah 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
91 LI Victoria 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
92 ZHAO Emily W. 11% 43% 34% 10% 1% - -
93 SCOTT Eve 21% 40% 28% 9% 1% - -
94 XU Emily T. 4% 21% 36% 27% 10% 2% -
95 ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) 33% 43% 20% 4% - -
96 MONTORIO Lily M. 10% 36% 36% 15% 3% - -
96 YAN Lena 16% 40% 31% 11% 2% - -
98 CHIANG Melissa 33% 44% 19% 4% - - -
99 CANSECO Carly 13% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
100 ELNATAN Mica A. 28% 43% 23% 5% - -
101 WUNNAVA Elina 29% 41% 23% 6% 1% - -
102 WUNNAVA Ellora 56% 36% 7% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.