San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOTELLO Natalia | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% |
| 2 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 3 | STONE Anne-Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 3 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 28% |
| 5 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 6 | JOHNSON Honor | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 7 | KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 8 | KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 9 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 10 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 8% |
| 11 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 12 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | LU Vivian Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% | |
| 14 | YUN Joy | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 15 | LI Amanda C. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 16 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 17 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 18 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 19 | BURKE Nora S. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 20 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 21 | BENTOLILA Esther | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | GHAYALOD reya | 8% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | KIM Zoe | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 24 | MIKA Veronica | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | LIN Audrey J. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 24% |
| 26 | GORDON Tamar | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
| 29 | MARSEE Samantha | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 30 | MOYA Keona L. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 31 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 33 | KRASTEV Minna | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | < 1% |
| 34 | BOIS Adele | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 35 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 37 | HILD Nisha | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 38 | PAUL Lila | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | JULIEN Michelle | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | TONG Kunling | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 41 | JENKINS Ryan J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 42 | TZOU Alexandra | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 43 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 43 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 43 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 46 | CHIOLDI Mina | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | CAO Stephanie X. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 48 | GHOSH Priyanka | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 49 | KOVACS Sophia | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
| 50 | TAO Hannah J. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 51 | MILLER Sky | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 52 | HANADARI-LEVY Amit | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 53 | HARRILL Gillian N. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 54 | THEODORE Maria A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 55 | LACSON Sarah | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | CHANG Emily | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 58 | HONE Katarina G. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 59 | SZETO Chloe | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 60 | PRIEUR Lauren | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 61 | JUNG Irene | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 63 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 64 | SADIK HANA | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | BRIND'AMOUR Pamela | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 66 | YONG Erika E. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 67 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% |
| 68 | YODER Bridget H. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 69 | STONE Hava S. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 70 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 71 | FEARNS Zara A. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 72 | SAYLES Nina R. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 73 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 74 | CODY Alexandra C. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 75 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 76 | GUZMAN Mariana M. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 77 | WU Erica L. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 78 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 3% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 79 | VESTEL Mira B. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 80 | NEIBART Fiona | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | TIMOFEYEV Daniella | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 82 | JOHNSON Lauren | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 82 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 31% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 84 | KER Grace | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 85 | LIANG Megan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 86 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 87 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 88 | BLUM Leah I. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
| 89 | OISHI Megumi | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 90 | KIM Catherine | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 91 | HURST Kennedy | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | FANG Victoria W. | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 93 | BILILIES Sophia | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 95 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
| 96 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 97 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 98 | LI Victoria J. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 98 | CHIANG Emily | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | CHING Sapphira S. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 100 | CHIN Erika J. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 100 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 103 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | KALRA Himani V. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 105 | DRAGON Rainer | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 106 | CHEN Jane | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 107 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 107 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 109 | WANG Elysia | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 110 | KYNETT Kathryn G. | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 111 | HE Charlotte | - | 5% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 112 | XU Ellen | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 113 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 114 | CHIN Sophia J. | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 115 | GLUCK Myriam | 45% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 116 | SHEA Erin | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 117 | HOLMES Emma | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 118 | SINHA Anika | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 119 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 120 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 121 | BAKER Audrey C. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 29% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 123 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | 36% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 124 | WU Zoe | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 125 | CHEN Xinyan | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 125 | SUN Alyssa | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 127 | DEMING Clare L. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 127 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | DUNLAP Allison N. | 25% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | NGUYEN Thi | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.