San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 3 | CRANOR Erich L. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | BARREIRO Darren | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 6 | EXUM Travis H. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 7 | HELGE James R. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | V D D V D D | V V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 9 | FRANK Fred | V V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 11 | MEHALL Michael | V V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 12 | KURITZ Marc M. | V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | GAINES Aaron | V V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | EMARA Elsayed M. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 15 | BAILEY Creston P. | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | D V D D D V | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | LUONG Allen | V V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 18 | GUMAGAY Paul | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | LEE Stephen K. | V D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 21 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | V D V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 22 | STEWART Robert | D V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | CHEN Steve | D V V D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 24 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | V D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | ROOD Alex | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 26 | BECK Brian C. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | HARGROVE Charles | D D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | UNGER Marc A. | D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 29 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | WEINTRAUB Adam | D D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 31 | LIU Bobby P. | D D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | REID Michael | D D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | KONG Li Kuo | V D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | BEITTEL David F. | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 35 | LOGUE Paul | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 36 | DUONG John | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | WIESE Michael | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 38 | ROGERS John D. | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 39 | KAIN Brad | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | FUHRMANN Amir | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.