Fortune Fencing SYC/RCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 WYMAN Julian 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
2 CANLAS Nathan 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 45%
3 COELHO Cristiano P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 71%
3 DINSAY Kristjan 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 18%
5 NICOLETTI Luca 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 65% 20%
6 MARTIN IV Elmer D. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 33%
7 SIU Aiden 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 52%
8 CHEN Charlie Tian-You 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 12%
9 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 35%
10 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 59%
11 SISINNI Riccardo 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 53%
12 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 70%
13 OH Jaden 100% 100% 99% 90% 53% 13%
14 SADOVSKY Leor B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
15 KIM Ryan Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 35%
16 KRYLTSOV Michael 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 44%
17 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 51% 12%
18 LO Preston 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 51% 11%
19 LI Matthew 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 33% 6%
20 WANG Ethan 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 32% 4%
21 PARK Gabriel 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 52% 13%
22 NGUYEN Martin 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 76% 23%
23 CORTRIGHT Skipper 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43% 5%
24 TSAO Lukas 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 22%
25 WU Lucas 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 6% 1%
26 MA Bryant 100% 100% 100% 93% 59% 15%
27 MORROW Brenden 100% 100% 99% 87% 47%
28 YI William 100% 99% 85% 47% 10%
29 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 10%
30 LLIDO Soren 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 48% 9%
31 LING Eddie 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 30% 5%
32 YU Jason 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 9%
33 KIM Aiden 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 15%
34 SHAGIDANYAN German 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 62% 11%
35 ZHENG zhe 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 32%
36 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 52% 13%
37 PINCHENG Yao 100% 99% 85% 51% 18% 3% -
38 KIAYIAS Aris 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 12%
39 WANG Logan 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 26% 3%
40 LI Samuel 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 21% 3%
41 DERRICK Blake 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 32% 5%
42 RASMUSSEN Sage 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 7%
43 TUAN Evan 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 14% 1%
44 LAM Nicolas 100% 98% 84% 50% 16% 2% -
45 MA Andrew 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 36%
46 PARK Ryan 100% 100% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
47 RYOU Andy 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 44% 9%
48 PONS Diego 100% 100% 99% 91% 58% 19% 2%
49 LYNCH Owen C. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 30% 3%
50 LIU Zixian (Aaron) 100% 100% 100% 95% 69% 25% 2%
51 WU Alber Y. 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 53% 13%
52 LEE Christopher T. 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 39%
52 TONKOVICH Ryan 100% 99% 87% 55% 17% 2%
54 DE LA FUENTE Ian 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 12% 1%
55 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) 100% 100% 98% 84% 52% 18% 3%
56 PARK Rion 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 10% 1%
57 TSAY Jordan R. 100% 100% 99% 89% 52% 12% 1%
58 AGRAWAL Niki 100% 99% 77% 39% 11% 2% -
59 PARK Sky 100% 100% 99% 87% 56% 19% 2%
60 PARK Steve (Sangmin) 100% 95% 69% 26% 3%
61 KIM Daniel Y. 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17% 2%
62 UHLIG Cole 100% 95% 71% 32% 7% 1% -
63 ZHANG Graham 100% 83% 40% 10% 1% - -
64 YANG Charles 100% 100% 93% 65% 25% 4% -
65 PARK David 100% 100% 94% 58% 17% 2% -
66 CHUN Dashel 100% 90% 43% 8% 1% -
67 KALAMAS Nikolas 100% 91% 58% 19% 3% - -
68 HIRAMOTO Satoshi 100% 90% 59% 22% 4% - -
69 FANG Jaden 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 18% 3%
70 CHOI Ethan 100% 100% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
71 CHAN Joseph 100% 97% 81% 45% 12% 1% -
72 RAUTUREAU Arthur 100% 93% 66% 28% 6% 1% -
73 BAKER Ethan 100% 98% 78% 39% 10% 1% -
74 PETROV Mikhail 100% 94% 66% 25% 4% - -
75 BANUELOS Dario 100% 22% 2% < 1% - - -
76 LE Jacob H. 100% 95% 68% 28% 6% -
77 LIU William 100% 93% 63% 24% 4% -
78 DULAI Angad 100% 98% 77% 31% 6% -
79 LI Jett 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 6% -
80 CHOURASIA Ashirvad 100% 98% 82% 47% 13% 2% -
81 ZHANG Lucas 100% 98% 81% 42% 11% 1% -
82 RAUTUREAU Hugo 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
83 PORTER Rory 100% 92% 60% 22% 3% - -
84 LU Kevin 100% 100% 97% 78% 36% 7% -
85 SAH Steven 100% 100% 97% 74% 31% 5% -
85 EDISON Ansel 100% 99% 87% 54% 18% 2% -
87 LEE Dylan 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 3%
88 TAN Youkai (Isaac) 100% 46% 9% 1% - - -
89 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 100% 97% 68% 28% 7% 1% -
90 GORDON William L. 100% 87% 50% 15% 2% - -
91 BORG Matthew 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 3% -
92 DANIEL Nikith 100% 98% 85% 51% 15% 1% -
93 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. 100% 98% 86% 53% 19% 3% -
94 TULYAG Azim 100% 97% 74% 35% 8% 1% -
95 MONTGOMERY Georgie 100% 92% 63% 25% 4% - -
96 REICHEL Ezra 100% 92% 57% 17% 2%
97 GREENEBAUM Oliver 100% 51% 12% 1% -
98 KIM KEVIN 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 26%
99 BARTSCH Henry 100% 95% 68% 28% 6% - -
100 DENG David 100% 98% 75% 35% 8% 1% -
101 YU ZiRun (Kinton) 100% 94% 68% 31% 7% 1% -
102 WONG Evan 100% 96% 77% 40% 11% 1% -
103 SEIGEL Duncan 100% 97% 76% 30% 5% - -
104 MANIKTALA Suvir 100% 96% 67% 25% 4% - -
105 OPATKIEWICZ Aidan 100% 41% 7% - - - -
106 UPENDER West 100% 49% 11% 1% - - -
107 ORNELAS Matteo 100% 87% 40% 8% 1% - -
108 ZHOU Ryan 100% 97% 74% 28% 5% - -
109 LI Richard 100% 91% 61% 24% 5% - -
110 PARRISH Evan 100% 89% 54% 19% 4% - -
111 ZHONG Maxwell 100% 71% 16% 1% - - -
112 ZHANG Max 100% 73% 30% 6% 1% - -
113 VAQUILAR Felix L. 100% 87% 35% 5% - - -
114 HE Bourne 100% 89% 52% 15% 2% - -
115 TSOI Spencer 100% 79% 38% 9% 1% - -
116 BEECHER Keegan 100% 32% 3% - - -
117 ZHANG Jayden 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 7% 1%
118 PERKINS Jaray 100% 91% 59% 20% 3% - -
119 KAREHT Kai 100% 68% 25% 5% - - -
120 LIANG Ethan 100% 36% 5% - - - -
120 CZYZEWSKI Oliver 100% 69% 27% 5% - - -
122 STRUNK Jonathan 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% - -
122 HAN Steve Hyuksoo 100% 24% 2% - - - -
124 YUE Jackson 100% 67% 25% 5% - - -
124 TAN Pyron 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% - -
126 SISINNI Leonardo 100% 60% 18% 3% - -
127 JEONG Taewoo 100% 31% 4% - - - -
127 FOY Grant 100% 45% 5% - - - -
129 CHANG Nathan 100% 78% 37% 10% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.