The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

THRUST FALL ROC/RYC w/Veterans and Y8

Div II Men's Foil

Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 1:00 PM

Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ONIK Elijah T. - - - 2% 12% 39% 46%
2 ZELTSER Lawrence M. - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 28%
3 TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. - 3% 16% 38% 33% 10%
3 MARSHALL Ian - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
5 ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. - 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
6 WEI William - 11% 38% 39% 12% 1%
7 AHN Jun 1% 26% 52% 22%
8 SHA Yi Peng - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 17%
9 FOGELSON Frederick J. - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
10 SEAH Chad - - 1% 5% 19% 40% 35%
11 TIAN Aaron C. - 1% 10% 29% 40% 19%
12 FRITZ Ayden R. - 1% 6% 23% 37% 27% 7%
13 GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas - - 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
14 KULKARNI Ansh A. - - 2% 10% 29% 40% 19%
15 STRAYER Andrew - - 2% 15% 35% 35% 12%
16 BAE Kevin - 10% 44% 46%
17 YEROKHIN Michael N. - - - 2% 15% 42% 40%
18 FEDONCHIK Henry J. - 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 5%
19 MAGIDSON Gabriel - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
20 GALLUCCI Charles John 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 4%
21 BUERGIN Aidan - 1% 6% 24% 38% 25% 6%
22 KIZHNER Fillip 1% 9% 27% 36% 21% 6% 1%
23 YULDASHEV Timur 1% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
24 AMRANI David 12% 36% 34% 15% 3% - -
25 REZNICK Nicholas J. - - 3% 19% 46% 32%
26 TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) - 1% 9% 31% 41% 18%
27 DU Samuel R. - 1% 5% 22% 42% 29%
28 MAHON Jacob 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
29 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 1% 9% 25% 33% 23% 8% 1%
30 ENGEL Henry R. - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
31 HONG Issac - 4% 16% 33% 31% 13% 2%
32 DESOLA Aidan J. 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2%
33 SHIKHMAN Robert - - 4% 22% 47% 27%
34 GRAHAM Aleko - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 12%
34 BOISLARD Adam J. 1% 6% 20% 32% 28% 12% 2%
36 YEE Charles E. - 1% 5% 19% 37% 31% 7%
37 MENG Zhaoyi - 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8%
38 ORR Aidan 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3%
39 SANTULLI Tristan 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
39 BROWN Alexander R. 5% 27% 42% 22% 5% - -
41 VERSTEELE Sander - - 2% 11% 33% 39% 15%
42 WERWA Griffith 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1% -
43 ZHAO Jesse 2% 11% 27% 33% 20% 6% 1%
44 WANG JONATHAN - 2% 13% 34% 35% 15% 2%
45 ANCONA Christopher - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
46 BAO Wenyuan 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% - -
47 ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman - 6% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
48 MACRAE Harrison A. - - 3% 14% 36% 37% 10%
49 MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. - 5% 21% 37% 29% 7%
50 MAYER Richard 7% 29% 37% 21% 5% -
51 BELLUOMO David C. 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% -
52 BOUTIN Nathaniel J. 1% 35% 43% 18% 3% -
53 ADVINCULA Dash 4% 44% 42% 10%
54 MONTALBINE Aidan 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
55 EIG Ethan A. 6% 30% 40% 19% 4% - -
56 HENSLEY Todd 7% 24% 33% 24% 9% 2% -
57 SUN Matthew 6% 30% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
58 SPOSATO Luke B. 7% 29% 37% 21% 5% 1% -
59 TAHOUN Mostafa 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 1%
60 GALBAN Matthias L. 6% 27% 40% 22% 5% -
61 WANG Gerald Y. 1% 10% 27% 35% 22% 6% -
62 ARANA Massimo 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
63 HILMER Michael - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
64 VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. 5% 20% 33% 27% 12% 2% -
65 YU Dale 36% 42% 18% 3% - -
66 NITTEL Jake 24% 43% 26% 6% 1% -
67 MUNDAHL Brandon D. - 3% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
67 JUSTUS Benjamin 40% 43% 15% 2% - - -
69 GALLER Dave 3% 18% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
69 DEMARCO Matthew 8% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
71 SONG Bryan 3% 14% 29% 31% 18% 5% -
72 BOUSSY Luciano 11% 39% 36% 12% 2% - -
73 KLYCZEK Andrew - 12% 40% 36% 11% 1%
74 MUNDAHL Morgan K. 21% 44% 28% 6% 1% -
75 CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
76 ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" 32% 43% 20% 4% - - -
77 CRANS Benjamin 62% 31% 6% 1% - - -
78 GOLISANO Tyler A. 59% 34% 6% 1% - - -
79 ZHANG HANMO 87% 12% - -
80 ROTHCHILD Matthew 25% 41% 25% 7% 1% -
81 VISHNEVSKY Aden 93% 7% - - - -
82 KEANNA Peter 1% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
83 XU Mathu Yang 40% 42% 15% 2% - - -
84 MAGIDSON Josh 14% 40% 34% 11% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.