Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SCHENCK Koen M. | V D D V V | V V V V V V | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 2 | KLOSTERMANN Max | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | SHA Yi Peng | V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | ZHAI Jeffrey | D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 5 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 6 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | KNIZHNIK David | V D V D V | V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 8 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | V V D V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | DU Samuel R. | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | LIN James G. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 11 | SHIN Joshua J. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | V V D V D | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 13 | CHENG Nathan | D V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | KIM Yonjae | V D D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 15 | WELCH Kyle J. | V D D V D | V V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 16 | HSIUNG Richie | D V D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 17 | WU Dawei | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | WU Alexander | V V V V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 19 | ZOBEL Eric H. | V V D V V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 20 | JIANG Owen | V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 21 | PYO Michael M. | V D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | LAURICELLA Douglas | V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | DAUM Charlie | V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 24 | LEWIS Akhil | V V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 25 | FU Samuel Y. | V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 26 | LI Matthew | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 27 | BADLANI Dev | D V V D V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 28 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 29 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 30 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 31 | LI Eric | V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 32 | DREW Nicolas | D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | FINLEY Dylan | V V V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 34 | SONG Bryan | V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 35 | PO Oliver | V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 36 | MATSAKH Philip | V D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 36 | JOSEPH Willem | D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 38 | WANG Michael | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 39 | COZINE Owen N. | D V D D V | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 40 | CHENG Jonathan | D D D V D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 41 | YOON DYLAN | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 42 | ZHEN Ethan | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 42 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 42 | WU Michael | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 45 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 45 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D D D D V | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 45 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 48 | PETERSON Dale | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 50 | KLOTZ Isaiah | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 51 | AMRANI David | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 52 | REZA Farazi | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 53 | TSAI William | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 53 | NIECHWADOWICZ Michael | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.