Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Riley | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 2 | BLISS Atticus H. | V V V D D V | V V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | COX Matthew T. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | BURTON Patrick | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 5 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | MOSES Alexander | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | GOLDMAN Rami | V V D D V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 8 | CUMMINGS Kai W. | D D D D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 9 | GREEN Jake L. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | BRONZO Justin G. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | MUGA Boris | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | JONES Dominic R. | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | TODREAS Simon | V D V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 14 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 15 | STEVENS James F. | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V D V D V D | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 17 | MAENG Jake W. | V V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 18 | DRAKE Owen G. | V V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 19 | LI Brian X | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 20 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 21 | YAO Shun | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 22 | SMITH Jackson | V V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 23 | XIAO Zherui | D V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 24 | PARK Jong-Eun | V D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 25 | HOLDERNESS Landon | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 26 | ROMERO Caleb E. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 27 | LAWLER Aidan | V D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 28 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | D D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 29 | INSLER Ethan C. | V D D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 30 | GUMAGAY Paul | D D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 31 | SMITH Nicholas S. | V D D D V D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 32 | BURCH Tristan H. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | HU Alexander W. | V D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 34 | KAEDING Alexander (Alex) B. | D V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 35 | WEISE Eli S. | D V V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 36 | VANDERVELDE Pierce F. | D V V D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 37 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | V V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 38 | LIANG Aaron | D V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 39 | MORSE Tyler | V D V D D D | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 40 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | V D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 41 | SMAY II Joseph E. | V D V D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 42 | KUHN Jeffrey | D D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 43 | PARTRIDGE Lucas F. | V D D D V D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 44 | LIPTON Michael D. | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 45 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 46 | THORESON Gary C. | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 47 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 48 | KASTENBERG Leo M. | D D D D D V | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 48 | VAN VOORHEES Andrew | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 50 | RYAN Christopher | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 51 | KIRSCH Adam J. | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 52 | SPENCER Richard (Spenc) E. | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 53 | KATOPES Peter | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 54 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 55 | SMITH Brandon J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 56 | GRAVIS Martin V. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.