The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Boston Fencing Club SYC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KIM Nicholas W. - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
2 ONIK Elijah T. - - 2% 15% 35% 35% 13%
3 FU Samuel Y. - - - 5% 23% 44% 28%
3 BAE Kevin - - 1% 8% 29% 44% 18%
5 CHENG Jonathan - - - 2% 13% 41% 45%
6 AZUELA Maximo - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
7 COSTELLO Chaissen F. - 1% 8% 22% 34% 27% 9%
8 BING Charles - - - 2% 15% 43% 40%
9 HUTH Mitchell - - - 5% 25% 46% 24%
10 KAO Castor T. - 1% 9% 31% 41% 17%
11 DAI Jonathan T. - - 4% 21% 46% 30%
12 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 1% 10% 36% 53%
13 LI Richard - - - 4% 20% 43% 32%
14 ZELTSER Lawrence M. - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
15 SINGH Dayaal - 1% 7% 28% 44% 21%
16 RUSADZE Nickolas - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
17 HOOSHI Dylan M. - - - 2% 15% 42% 40%
18 KEE Andrew L. - - 3% 17% 39% 33% 7%
19 KIM Yonjae - - 5% 24% 45% 27%
20 NAGER Noah - - 4% 16% 34% 34% 12%
21 KIM Tei D. - - - 4% 23% 45% 28%
22 GRAHAM Roy J. - - - - 6% 36% 57%
23 DU Samuel R. - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 13%
24 AHN Jun - 6% 27% 43% 21% 3%
25 LEE Joshua - - - 4% 25% 53% 18%
26 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
27 GEOGHEGAN Ronan - 2% 10% 30% 37% 18% 3%
28 TSAI Max W. - 2% 14% 34% 35% 13% 2%
29 LI Owen - - 1% 12% 35% 39% 12%
30 PAN Eric 1% 8% 23% 34% 25% 8% 1%
31 ZHANG Evan - 1% 10% 30% 38% 18% 3%
32 MARX Jackson L. - - 7% 27% 40% 22% 4%
33 KWON Ethan - - 3% 15% 37% 36% 9%
34 SYOMICHEV Gleb A. 4% 19% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
35 SICHITIU Alexander - 3% 13% 28% 33% 19% 4%
36 WANG Jonathan - 2% 16% 39% 32% 10% 1%
37 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - 1% 11% 34% 40% 14%
38 LEE Aidan - - 7% 26% 38% 23% 5%
39 WU Alexander - 1% 7% 27% 41% 22% 3%
40 ANTON Nathaniel - 1% 11% 35% 40% 12% 1%
41 WANG Alex L. 2% 25% 45% 23% 4% - -
42 YU Jason - 5% 24% 41% 24% 5% -
43 CATINO Brennen - 6% 31% 40% 19% 4% -
44 ORVANANOS Jorge 1% 15% 40% 33% 10% 1%
45 MARX Oscar L. - - 4% 22% 45% 29%
46 PAE Jonathan L. - - 4% 22% 47% 27%
47 MCLEAN Miles K. 1% 8% 30% 39% 19% 3%
48 PAE Brian L. - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 3%
49 DAVIDSON Elliot 16% 39% 32% 12% 2% - -
50 GAO Anthony - 10% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
51 MIALL Steven A. - - 9% 30% 37% 19% 4%
52 XIANG Derrick 2% 19% 42% 29% 7% 1% -
53 ZHEN Ethan - 3% 22% 41% 26% 6% -
54 GUO Sean 2% 33% 43% 19% 3% -
55 SHIN Joshua J. 1% 12% 35% 36% 14% 2%
56 QI Steve 13% 40% 35% 11% 1% -
57 FORTUNE Alexander J. 27% 46% 23% 4% - -
58 CHEN Kyle P. 1% 11% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
59 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 2% 14% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
60 LOU Darren 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
61 ALIMI Yacine A. - 3% 21% 45% 26% 4% -
62 LI Eric - - 5% 24% 42% 25% 5%
63 JIANG Owen - 6% 28% 41% 21% 4%
64 LEE Jacob J 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
65 GU Andrew - 1% 21% 39% 28% 9% 1%
66 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
67 MENG Zhaoyi 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
68 GONG Benjamin - - 3% 19% 40% 30% 8%
69 LIN James G. - 2% 19% 40% 30% 8% 1%
70 LI Matthew 2% 17% 34% 31% 13% 3% -
71 SONG Austin 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
72 LI Chenglang Ryan 8% 38% 38% 13% 2% - -
73 TANG August L. 1% 6% 22% 37% 26% 8% 1%
73 TORRES Treston 13% 34% 33% 15% 4% - -
75 WECHSLER Jacob 1% 10% 29% 37% 19% 4% -
76 SVERDLOV Seth 8% 32% 39% 18% 3% - -
77 MITRA Debarghya 15% 44% 34% 6% - - -
78 LI Jinghua E. 1% 13% 38% 34% 12% 2% -
79 ACHILOV Sayid 2% 13% 30% 33% 17% 4% -
80 XU Ethan 7% 30% 41% 19% 3% -
81 LIN Michael - 7% 28% 39% 21% 5% -
82 WANG Mason 18% 47% 29% 6% - - -
83 ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" 40% 46% 13% 1% - - -
84 PROMRAT Pete 2% 31% 42% 21% 4% - -
85 LIU Charles 39% 48% 12% 1% - - -
86 HUA Aiden 27% 49% 21% 3% - - -
87 GUO Justin 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% - -
88 JIA Jing Yu 60% 37% 3% - - - -
89 SHAO Eric 29% 43% 22% 5% - - -
90 TANG Albert 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
91 LEWIS Nikhil I. 87% 13% 1% - - - -
92 LIGOS Alex M. 39% 51% 9% 1% - - -
93 LEWIS Akhil 29% 45% 21% 4% - -
93 BAUMANN Gunnar 36% 43% 17% 3% - -
95 LI Yao (Liam) 3% 15% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
96 WANG Julang 88% 12% 1% - - -
97 HUANG Eythan 36% 44% 17% 2% - - -
97 XU Feng 15% 43% 34% 8% 1% - -
99 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 46% 42% 11% 1% - - -
100 LU Xiao 30% 62% 8% - - - -
101 TING Clement 67% 30% 3% - - - -
102 LOU Felix 22% 39% 27% 9% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.