The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Back to School RYC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BANERJEE Anup - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
2 CHIN Julian S. - - - 1% 14% 50% 35%
3 MURUHIN Yaroslav - - 1% 6% 23% 43% 28%
3 DIERKS Kian - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
5 JEON Caleb A. - - - - 1% 16% 83%
6 WONG Nicholas A. - - - 1% 9% 35% 54%
7 CHUANG Kian J. - 2% 14% 37% 39% 8%
8 MU Jeffrey 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
9 LO Conrad - - - - 6% 39% 55%
10 WANG Andrew - - 3% 23% 48% 26%
10 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. - 1% 10% 30% 40% 18%
12 SADOVSKY Leor B. 1% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
13 YEE Johnathan - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
14 DETERING Julian - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
15 NG Eben S. - - 4% 19% 44% 34%
16 SUNG Chang-Han S. - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23%
17 HOBSON Aaron K. - - 2% 14% 34% 37% 13%
18 CHIRASHNYA Adam - - 2% 15% 44% 39%
19 HUANG Kevin D. - 1% 12% 39% 39% 9%
20 YU Leo - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 11%
21 LI Ryan Z. 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 4% -
22 WONG Luke S. 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 9% 1%
23 CHIRASHNYA Daniel - - - 3% 20% 54% 23%
24 WHITE Austin M. - - 1% 9% 39% 46% 5%
25 NG Kenneth 11% 41% 35% 11% 2% -
26 CHOPRA Rohan A. - 4% 30% 43% 20% 2%
27 BAEK David - 1% 11% 42% 36% 9%
28 LUH Ethan K. - 2% 11% 32% 40% 15%
29 BARTELS Milo 9% 31% 38% 19% 3% -
30 SEEDS Edward T. 1% 5% 18% 33% 30% 12% 1%
31 WU Lucas - - 2% 13% 41% 37% 7%
32 PIESNER Zachary C. - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
33 HUSSAIN Ibrahim 1% 9% 33% 41% 14% 1% -
34 TAPUS Alexandru 1% 10% 35% 37% 15% 2% -
35 CANLAS Nathan - - 1% 19% 48% 32%
36 LIN Richard 2% 15% 42% 32% 8% 1% -
37 WILT Daniel E. 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
38 MA Andrew 1% 8% 26% 35% 23% 6% -
38 HARRIS Otto 17% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
40 WONG Matthew H. - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
41 HE Bu Wei O. - 6% 30% 44% 17% 2% -
42 TEH Ryan 1% 9% 28% 36% 20% 5% -
43 LEVY Jacob - 4% 28% 43% 22% 3%
44 MA Bryant 11% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
45 RUBIN Max 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% -
46 TAPUS Andrei 17% 48% 30% 4% - -
47 SHEN Owen 1% 8% 30% 39% 19% 3%
48 ANDERSON Jacob 12% 40% 39% 9% 1% -
49 LI Jett 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
50 AIKEN Nicholas A. - - 5% 26% 46% 21% 1%
51 CHENG Jonathan - 5% 22% 40% 27% 5% -
52 MAK Osman K. 6% 26% 39% 23% 5% - -
53 TUAN Evan 2% 14% 35% 34% 13% 2%
54 CHEN Justin K. 13% 36% 35% 14% 2% -
55 BUFIY Aeneas 11% 34% 35% 16% 3% -
56 GERA Kaveer 66% 31% 3% - - -
57 AMAYA Jared C. 35% 41% 19% 4% - - -
58 CHIN Ryan 16% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
59 BREEZE Jared 30% 43% 21% 5% 1% - -
60 ZHANG Luke 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
61 CRACRAFT John R. 3% 17% 38% 32% 9% 1%
62 HUSSAIN Ismail A. 37% 46% 16% 1% - -
63 JUDSON Colin 19% 43% 29% 8% 1% - -
64 FANG Jaden 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
65 GRAPHIA Gabriel 11% 50% 32% 7% 1% - -
66 CHU Colin 33% 47% 17% 2% - - -
67 CHEN Evan 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
68 MIN Lucas 19% 63% 16% 1% - -
68 SISINNI Riccardo 41% 41% 15% 2% - -
70 RAINS Jackson T. 35% 50% 14% 1% - - -
71 ZENG Chuyi 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
72 LIU William 7% 29% 37% 21% 6% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.