Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIEFER Lee O. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 2 | GUO Jessica Zi Jia | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 3 | DESCHNER Stefani K. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 3 | PETROVA Kristina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 5 | DEVORE Delphine P. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 6 | QIAN Crystal | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 7 | CHO Sabrina N. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 8 | DUBROVICH Jacqueline | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 9 | SCRUGGS Lauren S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 10 | RHODES Zander | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% |
| 11 | BLOW Iman (Mani) A. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% |
| 12 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 13 | ANDREYENKA Yana | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 8% |
| 14 | CAO Arianna L. | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
| 15 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 16 | FERRARI Christina M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 17 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | CHENG Evelyn | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 19 | TAFFEL sara | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 20 | TIEU May L. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 21 | CATANTAN Samantha Kyle | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 22 | LACHMAN Antonina | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 23 | CHEN Jia P. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 25 | CAULFIELD Jane | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 26 | ZEISS Madison E. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 48% | 21% |
| 27 | LEE Alina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 28 | JING Emily | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 29 | ZHENG Ivy | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | ZHENG Vivian | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 31 | KOO Rachel A. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 32 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 34 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 35 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 36 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 37 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 38 | APELIAN Katherine | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 39 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | KIM Katherine | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | WANG Ellen | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 42 | KOO Haley B. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
| 43 | CHO Gracie L. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 45 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 46 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 5% |
| 47 | HORSLEY Asherah | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 2% |
| 48 | NISHIMURA Madeleine A. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 2% |
| 48 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 50 | BREKER Anika | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | LUNG Katerina | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 52 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 53 | KIM Rachael | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 54 | CHO Cameron S. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 55 | HE Elizabeth W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 56 | YANG Iris | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | KOLODZIEJCZYK Malwina | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 58 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 59 | JING Alexandra | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 60 | PARK Rowan M. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 61 | KORABLINA Aleksandra | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 62 | EYER Hailey M. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 63 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 64 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 2% |
| 65 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 66 | HAYES Nadia | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 67 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | 2% |
| 68 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 69 | STAMOS Maria | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 70 | LEE Yejine | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 71 | LUKINS Tianji | - | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 72 | KOROL Neta | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 73 | HOSONO Rei W. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 73 | KLINE Melissa C. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 75 | SHEN Lydia | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 76 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 77 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 78 | ANDREYENKA Hanna | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
| 79 | BIASCO Anna | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 80 | YU Lauren C. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 81 | LEE Annora Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 82 | ZHANG Yunjia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 2% |
| 83 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 84 | JANG Kimberley | 1% | 11% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 85 | SENIC Adeline | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 86 | MILLER Naomi E. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 86 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 88 | HO Brianna W. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 89 | SUN Ruoxi | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 90 | LI Sophia M. | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 91 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 92 | ZHENG Julie | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | LOCKE Savannah | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 94 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 94 | CHEN Allison V. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 96 | ROY Layla | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 97 | CHEN Jessie S. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 98 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 99 | MEI Sarah | 45% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 100 | YAROSHENKO Karina | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 3% |
| 101 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 102 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 103 | RANDOLPH Piper | 8% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 103 | CHO Rebecca H. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 105 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 107 | LEE Lavender | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 108 | WANDJI Anais | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 109 | ORVANANOS Anice | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 109 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 111 | PENG Amber L. | 2% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 111 | GOOR Viviene E. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 114 | LI Phoebe J. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 115 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 116 | CHUSID Renata M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 6% |
| 117 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 8% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 119 | YU Seneca | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 120 | CAO Ying | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 121 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 122 | LEE Ji Ahn | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 123 | SEO IRENE Y. | 13% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 124 | MAO Rebecca J. | 33% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 125 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 126 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 127 | VIANNA Gabriella | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 128 | DEBACK Greta I. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 129 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 130 | RENTON Samantha | 10% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 131 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 132 | UPTON Elizabeth | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 132 | WEBB Ella | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 132 | GU Emily | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 135 | PROCOPIO Lucia | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 136 | MI Aileen | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 137 | LUO Sandra J. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 138 | HAN Crystal | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 139 | JO Mia C. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 139 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 141 | HUNG Juliana K. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 141 | KOROL Dana | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 143 | SHIM Grace J. | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 144 | BURBERRY Livia | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 145 | CHEN Chloe I. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 146 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 147 | LI Shuang | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 148 | CALISE Ella | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 149 | COOPER Piper W. | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 149 | SHENG Chuxi | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 151 | SUN Chien-Yu | 30% | 44% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 151 | KIM Rachel | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 153 | CROMPTON Celia N. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 154 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 155 | ZHANG Eunice | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 156 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 20% | 50% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 156 | SHA Yi Ling | 42% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 158 | WONG Sophia M. | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 159 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 160 | BOLES Sophia | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.