The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

October NAC

Cadet Men's Foil

Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 2:00 PM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 JEON Caleb A. - - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
2 FUKUDA Renzo K. - - - 1% 10% 37% 52%
3 RUSADZE Nickolas - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
3 BAS Liam - - - - 5% 31% 63%
5 GODZHIK Zachary - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
6 SIU Aiden - - - 3% 16% 44% 37%
7 SONG Aiden S. - - - - 3% 26% 70%
8 LO Conrad - - - - 2% 19% 79%
9 JAIN Aditya - - - 6% 25% 43% 25%
9 TANG Owen S. - - 2% 10% 29% 40% 20%
11 LI Richard - - - - 5% 31% 63%
12 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
12 GONG Benjamin - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
14 ZHANG Yun Isaac - - 4% 21% 44% 29%
15 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - 1% 7% 31% 49% 12%
16 BRUK Peter J. - - - 2% 15% 41% 42%
17 YANG Luao - - - - 2% 23% 75%
18 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - - 4% 31% 65%
19 GAO William - 1% 6% 22% 42% 30%
20 CULLIVAN Justice - - - 3% 19% 45% 33%
21 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - - 4% 29% 66%
22 LI Eric - - 4% 20% 46% 30%
23 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
23 LEE Jacob J - - - 2% 17% 44% 37%
25 AHN Jun - - 1% 11% 40% 48%
26 DESHMUKH Arjun - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
27 MOHAMED Amir - - 3% 18% 40% 34% 6%
28 BANERJEE ANUP - - - 1% 11% 39% 48%
29 YU Anders - - - 5% 22% 43% 30%
30 SISINNI Riccardo - - 8% 31% 40% 18% 2%
31 PARK Jason B. 1% 7% 23% 37% 26% 6%
32 LI Owen - - - 1% 11% 40% 48%
33 COELHO Cristiano P. - - - 4% 19% 43% 33%
34 LU Yikai - - 1% 12% 36% 39% 11%
35 WU Alexander - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
36 CHENG Jonathan - 1% 5% 20% 37% 31% 7%
37 BING Charles - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
38 GRAHAM Roy J. - - - - 4% 25% 71%
39 KAO Castor T. - - - - 5% 30% 65%
39 WOO Christian - - 2% 11% 32% 41% 15%
41 HO Jia Le Sean - - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
42 TSIMIKLIS Yanni - 1% 6% 21% 37% 29% 7%
43 MIN Eric - 1% 5% 20% 37% 30% 6%
44 WONG Adrian - - 3% 15% 36% 35% 10%
45 ELKOUSY Laith H. - - 2% 12% 36% 38% 12%
45 REYES Omar - - 4% 21% 40% 29% 5%
45 DETERING Julian - 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 4%
48 KIM Yonjae - - - 2% 13% 40% 44%
49 KIAYIAS Aris - 7% 30% 40% 20% 3% -
50 GOOR Julian - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
51 TRAUGOT Owen G. - 1% 9% 30% 40% 18% 2%
52 GARCIA Sebastian R. - - 2% 15% 36% 35% 12%
53 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. - - 3% 17% 38% 34% 8%
53 GUERRA Gabriel H. - 1% 8% 25% 39% 24% 3%
53 LOVE Aaron - - 2% 13% 36% 41% 8%
56 NICOLETTI Luca - 2% 16% 38% 32% 11% 1%
57 YI William 3% 28% 40% 23% 6% 1% -
58 LI Matthew - - 5% 23% 39% 26% 6%
59 YAO Bradley 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 8% -
60 LEE Aidan - - 1% 6% 27% 45% 22%
61 KIM Minhyeok - 2% 10% 30% 38% 18% 2%
62 JI Aidan Y. - - 4% 25% 43% 25% 3%
63 PORRAS Cristian - 1% 9% 27% 38% 22% 4%
64 KEE Andrew L. - - 3% 13% 33% 38% 13%
65 MYERS Dean - 1% 20% 40% 29% 9% 1%
66 DORAN Wesley C. - - 1% 7% 26% 45% 21%
67 WECHSLER Jacob - 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 2%
68 ZHANG Aaron - 4% 23% 40% 26% 7% 1%
69 JIANG Owen - 1% 7% 28% 43% 20%
70 BADLANI Dev - 5% 24% 43% 24% 4%
71 WONG Garrick G. - - 3% 18% 38% 32% 9%
71 LIN Michael - - 2% 13% 35% 37% 13%
73 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. - - 8% 29% 39% 21% 4%
73 CO Dylan - 1% 7% 25% 38% 25% 5%
75 CHEN Charlie Tian-You - - 12% 34% 36% 15% 2%
75 ROSE Ben - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13% 2%
77 WEI Qiancheng (Matt) - 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 2%
78 WONG Antonio 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5% -
79 LEWIS Akhil - - 4% 23% 43% 27% 3%
79 CANLAS Nathan - 1% 7% 24% 38% 26% 5%
81 KIM Ryan Y. - - 2% 15% 39% 37% 5%
82 SHEN Mingxuan 11% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
83 TSAO Lukas - 9% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1%
84 DERRICK Blake 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 5% -
85 MUSHER Benjamin J. - 5% 21% 36% 28% 8% 1%
86 MA Andrew 1% 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% -
87 BURBERRY Alan - 12% 37% 36% 14% 2% -
88 HOSKERI Anik S. - 2% 14% 35% 34% 13% 1%
89 GUO Justin - 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
90 ORONOWICZ Jakub - 8% 30% 37% 20% 4% -
91 LI Samuel - 5% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
92 TALASILA Arush 2% 27% 49% 18% 3% - -
93 OH SEAN - 1% 11% 35% 41% 11%
94 ZHAO Bowen 29% 43% 23% 5% - -
95 SIMA Congyu Josh - 1% 9% 30% 39% 18% 3%
96 LIN James G. - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
97 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - 1% 8% 27% 40% 22% 2%
98 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - - 3% 16% 43% 38%
99 LEE Jonah - 2% 12% 31% 36% 17% 2%
99 WANG Mason - 1% 12% 36% 39% 12% 1%
101 YU Jason - 7% 30% 40% 19% 3% -
102 LEE Jacob - 1% 7% 28% 40% 22% 3%
103 LUH Ethan K. - - 2% 12% 34% 39% 13%
104 MOHAMED Murad - - 2% 13% 38% 37% 10%
105 ZHENG zhe - 3% 22% 40% 27% 7% 1%
106 LEE Christopher T. - 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1%
106 ORLOV Dmitriy - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
108 LING Eddie - 5% 24% 39% 26% 7% 1%
109 WU Alber Y. 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% -
110 RASMUSSEN Sage 2% 12% 32% 35% 16% 3% -
111 CHAN Ian 2% 30% 42% 21% 5% - -
112 MATSAKH Philip - 9% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
113 NGUYEN Martin 3% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2% -
114 WYMAN Julian - - 4% 21% 46% 29%
115 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - - 2% 10% 30% 40% 18%
116 QIAN Jason H. - 1% 12% 33% 36% 16% 2%
117 DOCTOR Aidan L. - - 4% 21% 39% 29% 7%
118 DINSAY Kristjan - 5% 24% 40% 26% 6% -
119 REEVES Liam - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18% 1%
120 SHAGIDANYAN German - 2% 24% 42% 26% 6% -
121 KIM Jackson - 5% 19% 34% 30% 11% 1%
122 FEDELI Francesco 1% 6% 23% 37% 25% 6% 1%
122 EDISON Ansel 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
124 GUO Sean - 3% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1%
125 SONG Bryan - 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
126 ZHAO Adam 2% 23% 43% 25% 6% 1% -
127 PALMA Matthew Dominic 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
128 TIAN allen - 4% 18% 34% 31% 11% 1%
129 PO Oliver - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
130 LI Aaron 1% 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% -
131 FUKUDA Diego 1% 11% 32% 35% 17% 3% -
132 WONG Yuheng Isaac 1% 13% 35% 34% 14% 2% -
133 YOON DYLAN - 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 1%
134 ORR Spencer - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
135 TIKHAEV Alexander - 7% 27% 38% 23% 5% -
136 GOGOI Vir K. 1% 6% 23% 37% 27% 7% -
136 PARRISH Evan 5% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
138 MIALL Steven A. - - 5% 20% 39% 31% 5%
139 FLYNN Ian 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6% -
140 TANG Albert 5% 24% 39% 25% 6% -
141 LI Matthew 3% 21% 39% 29% 8% 1%
142 GUTH Joseph 3% 16% 34% 32% 14% 2%
143 FINNEY Lorenz - 2% 23% 42% 26% 6% -
144 WU Alistair 7% 28% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
145 CORTRIGHT Skipper - 4% 23% 43% 26% 5% -
146 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2% -
147 LIU Ethan - 5% 23% 39% 26% 6% -
148 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. - 5% 27% 40% 23% 5% -
149 HUANG Eythan 6% 24% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
150 STRINGER David 1% 20% 39% 28% 9% 1% -
151 LIU Derek - 2% 16% 37% 34% 10% 1%
152 SUN Ryan 21% 41% 29% 8% 1% - -
153 TANG Alexander L. 1% 13% 33% 33% 16% 3% -
154 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) 5% 26% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
155 PARK Rion 8% 48% 34% 9% 1% - -
156 TULYAG Azim 6% 45% 37% 10% 1% - -
157 TANG August L. 4% 25% 40% 25% 6% -
158 LEE Brendan 5% 25% 39% 25% 6% -
159 RNO Kyler 25% 41% 26% 8% 1% -
160 MAO Lucas 4% 31% 42% 19% 3% -
161 MEJIA MATTHEW D. - - 7% 33% 41% 17% 1%
162 XU Andy P. 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
163 BOYKO Miles 9% 32% 37% 18% 3% - -
164 PAI Lakshan K. - 6% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
165 WUJASTYK Leon - 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
166 SANTOS Carlos R. 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
167 LIU Yucheng 4% 26% 41% 23% 6% 1% -
168 SHAO Eric 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% -
169 TONKOVICH Ryan 23% 40% 27% 8% 1% - -
170 TORRES Treston - 9% 34% 38% 16% 3% -
171 LO Preston 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
172 ORVANANOS Jorge - 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 3%
173 CHIN Ryan 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
173 ALONSO Vinicius 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1% -
175 LE Jacob H. 17% 39% 32% 11% 2% - -
176 ZHANG Matthew 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
177 SHEN Owen 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% -
178 WU Lucas 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2% -
179 MA Bryant 4% 22% 40% 26% 7% 1% -
179 LEE Eugene 12% 36% 35% 14% 3% - -
181 XU Ethan 7% 33% 38% 18% 4% - -
182 TSAY Jordan R. 25% 44% 25% 6% 1% - -
183 RAJ Jay 3% 18% 35% 31% 12% 2%
184 KLOTZ Isaiah 2% 15% 36% 34% 12% 1%
185 ALLEN Henry G. 4% 28% 43% 21% 4% -
186 MORROW Brenden 1% 11% 31% 35% 17% 3% -
187 AGRAWAL Niki 7% 47% 38% 8% 1% - -
188 LIU Zixian (Aaron) 10% 35% 36% 16% 3% - -
189 WANG Rory 25% 53% 20% 3% - - -
190 RIPA Joseph K. 51% 43% 6% - - - -
190 NGAI Julian 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
192 SAH Steven 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
192 PETERSON Matthew 4% 46% 38% 11% 1% - -
192 OLSON Emerson 6% 39% 40% 13% 2% - -
192 XU Ethan 4% 44% 38% 12% 2% - -
196 KIM Harrison 5% 24% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
196 GERRISH William 17% 41% 31% 10% 2% - -
196 PAN Henry - 15% 39% 32% 11% 2% -
196 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
196 VANOYEN Dominick 6% 26% 39% 23% 5% - -
201 LORENZO Alejandro 7% 28% 38% 22% 5% 1% -
202 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
202 FANG Jaden 22% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
202 XIE Buster 14% 42% 32% 10% 2% - -
202 LIM Lance Jeremiah 6% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
206 SHENG Dalton 4% 21% 36% 28% 10% 1% -
207 KIM Brian 1% 15% 42% 33% 9% 1% -
208 WANG Brian 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
209 SONG Noel 1% 31% 43% 21% 4% - -
210 HUANG Jonathan 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% -
211 ROZALSKI Eli 20% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
212 CHEN Kyle P. 3% 26% 40% 24% 6% 1% -
213 THIYAGARAJAA Ari 38% 55% 7% - - - -
214 HOWLAND Jonas 19% 73% 7% - - - -
215 PARK Sky 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1%
216 SENIC Lucas 7% 29% 39% 21% 4% -
217 LI Toby 23% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
218 CHENG Ethan 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1% -
218 NAIDL Josiah 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
220 SANDERS Jack 88% 11% - - - - -
221 MARTIN Dexter 76% 22% 2% - - - -
222 CHUN Dashel 67% 29% 4% - - -
223 WAKEHAM Paul 45% 41% 12% 2% - - -
224 CHUFONG-SPRAGUE Matthew 21% 41% 28% 8% 1% - -
224 GLOVER George 52% 41% 7% - - - -
226 KOE Beckett 54% 36% 9% 1% - -
227 WAKEHAM Timothy 75% 23% 2% - - - -
228 PETROV Mikhail 79% 19% 2% - - - -
228 COLEMAN Marcus 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% - -
228 MCKINLEY Luke 76% 22% 2% - - - -
231 MODADUGU Aryan 12% 35% 35% 16% 3% - -
232 SHANNON Jack 72% 25% 3% - - - -
233 KUANG Aaron 39% 41% 17% 3% - - -
233 BAI Brian 53% 44% 3% - - - -
235 CROOM Tucker 75% 23% 2% - - - -
235 KIM Jonah 72% 25% 3% - - - -
235 BURKE Reid 78% 22% - - - - -
235 LOCKWOOD Jacob 76% 22% 2% - - - -
235 PEAKE Lucas 87% 12% - - - - -
240 LIANG Ethan 96% 4% - - - - -
240 WEISS Quintin 88% 11% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.