Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
2 | DAVIS Jessica L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
3 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% |
3 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
5 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% |
6 | FENG ge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
7 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
8 | POIRIER Ariane | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
9 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
10 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
11 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
12 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
13 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
14 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | 1% |
15 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
16 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
17 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
18 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
19 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
20 | WELLS Tessa (Tesla) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% | 3% |
21 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 24% |
22 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
23 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
24 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
25 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
26 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 16% |
27 | PAN Angela | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
28 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
29 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
30 | BO GENESIS | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
31 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
32 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
33 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
34 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
35 | BENZAN India | 100% | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
36 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 97% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
37 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
38 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
39 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
40 | PORADA Yarena | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | HUANG Ziyan | 100% | 86% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
42 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - |
43 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
44 | SOTELO Michelle | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | CAFASSO Sabrina | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
46 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
47 | BYK Laura | 100% | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
48 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 100% | 95% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
49 | CHENG Shu Yi | 100% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
50 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 100% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
51 | CHOY Ida | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
52 | FENG Iris | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
53 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
54 | ZOU You Yang | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
55 | NIELSON Norah | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
56 | GORTI Ramya | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.