The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC (D1A/VET)

Y-10 Women's Saber

Friday, November 4, 2022 at 11:00 AM

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YAN Angela - - - 1% 10% 38% 50%
2 CAI Joanna - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
3 FAN Tina 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
3 YE Isabella - - 1% 7% 24% 40% 27%
5 NGUYEN Summer - - 1% 12% 47% 34% 6%
6 HU Ashley 2% 14% 35% 36% 14% 1%
7 CONG Catherine - - 2% 13% 35% 40% 10%
8 HWANG Sophie - 5% 23% 43% 28% 1%
9 HAYHOE Tara - 2% 10% 25% 35% 23% 5%
9 LONG Chloe - - 3% 12% 30% 37% 18%
11 KIM Saeren - 2% 11% 27% 35% 20% 4%
12 CHANG Kylie - - 1% 9% 48% 43%
13 CHENG Zijuan 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
14 JIANG Evelyn 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
15 RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
16 LAUREYNS Ainsley 3% 17% 33% 31% 14% 2%
17 BACKES Anastasia 3% 20% 39% 29% 8% -
18 SCHMIDT Sophie 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
19 DUDNICK Caitlin 2% 14% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
20 CHENG Anna 11% 37% 37% 13% 2% - -
21 LONG Jessie 8% 32% 40% 18% 3% - -
22 GUO Luna 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% -
23 SHI Maxine 27% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
24 HSU Aubrie 1% 8% 30% 41% 17% 3% -
25 LIU Anya 50% 38% 10% 1% - -
26 CHANG Kaitlyn 4% 19% 32% 28% 13% 3% -
27 TANG Athena 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
28 KWON Kaylin 15% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
29 LUC Christabel 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
30 ZHOU Kelsey 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
31 KENNEDY Elizabeth 1% 16% 38% 32% 12% 1%
32 QIU Abigail < 1% 2% 13% 36% 37% 12%
33 LANENGA Penelope < 1% - 4% 20% 39% 31% 5%

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.