Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHAMBERS Miles | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | KHANNA Adamantis | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | SONG Aidan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 5 | TITOV Zachary | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 6 | BEAL Colton | D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 7 | GUERRA Corey | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 8 | VIDREVICH David | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 9 | MALEK Zak | V V V V V V | V D | 1.9 | 6 | +4.1 |
| 10 | CHAVAN Aditya | D V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | BROOKS Drake | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | MIAO Heqi | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | DUTA Damian | V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | SHAPIRO Leo | V D D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | RABEL Sebastian | V V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 16 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 17 | LAU Kyrus | V V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 18 | WU Vincent | D V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 19 | CHUNG Hahnsooh | V D D D V V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 20 | LEIGH Brayden | D V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | HOWARTH Hayes | D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 22 | WANG William | V D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 23 | RABEL Alexander | V D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 24 | LIUZHANG Ben | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | D V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 26 | CHAN Brady | D D V D V D | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 27 | SHALISH Milan | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 28 | DUNKEL Paul | D D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 29 | ZHANG Mark | D D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 30 | ZHANG Howard | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 31 | ALLEN Parker | D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 32 | GIBBONS Robert | D D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 33 | SCHRODER Theodore | D D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 34 | WANG Adam | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.