Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TANG Owen S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | QIAN Jason H. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SENIC Lucas | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SHENG Dalton | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | WONG Garrick G. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 6 | WANG Brayden | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 7 | LORENZO Alejandro | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | HEARN Christen J. | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 9 | MATSAKH Philip | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 10 | ZOU Yuming | V D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | GUTH Joseph | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 12 | LEVY Jacob | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | ZHAO Adam | V D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 14 | DE COQUET Maximilian | V V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | FEDELI Francesco | D V V D D V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 16 | TWEMLOW Sacha | V D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | JURMAN Therin | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 18 | MOE Annan | V V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 19 | ZHANG Lucas | V D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | DENG David | D D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | D V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | LU Nathan | D D V D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 23 | FAN Yuchen | D V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 24 | LEVY rex | D V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | KOE Beckett | V D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | DING Tommy | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 27 | JOHNSON Soren | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 28 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 29 | DONG Joshua | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 30 | ELKIN David | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 31 | REDONDO Tomas D. | D D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 32 | ZHANG Bryan | D D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | KIMURA Ryo | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 34 | GADIYARAM Madhav | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 35 | SU Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.