The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

December NAC

Div I Women's Foil

Friday, December 9, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TIEU May L. - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
2 MASSIALAS Sabrina C. - - - 3% 14% 39% 43%
3 HE Elizabeth W. - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
3 LUNG Katerina - 1% 8% 30% 43% 18%
5 SHEN Sophia H. - - 4% 16% 35% 33% 12%
6 STAMOS Maria - 2% 11% 29% 39% 19%
7 NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
8 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. - - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
9 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
10 LEE Yejine - 1% 5% 19% 35% 31% 10%
11 CAO Arianna L. - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
12 LESLIE Ryanne T. 1% 6% 20% 34% 29% 11% 1%
13 YAROSHENKO Karina - 1% 7% 22% 34% 27% 8%
14 HORSLEY Asherah - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
15 KIM Katherine - 4% 16% 30% 31% 15% 3%
16 PEVZNER Victoria - - 4% 16% 34% 34% 12%
17 JING Emily - - 1% 8% 29% 45% 17%
18 LOCKE Savannah 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% < 1%
19 CHEN Jia P. 1% 10% 27% 36% 22% 5%
20 CHUSID Mikayla - 2% 12% 27% 33% 20% 5%
21 EYER Hailey M. - 4% 15% 30% 31% 16% 3%
22 WANG Ellen - - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
23 GRIFFIN Emma G. 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
24 HO Brianna W. - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
25 PARK Rowan M. - 3% 15% 34% 33% 14% 1%
26 CHO Cameron S. 1% 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
27 SHEN Lydia - 2% 12% 28% 34% 20% 4%
28 ZHENG Ivy - - 3% 12% 29% 37% 19%
29 ADLER Polly Z. - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
30 LEE Lavender 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
31 SENIC Adeline - 2% 12% 31% 36% 17% 2%
32 NISSINOFF Alexandra 22% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
33 ZEISS Madison E. - - - 2% 12% 42% 45%
34 KNIGHT Skylar - 4% 14% 29% 32% 17% 4%
35 LEE Alina - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
36 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
37 TAN Kaitlyn N. - 3% 13% 29% 34% 18% 3%
38 GOOR Viviene E. 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
39 KOKES Gabrielle - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
40 LIU Jaelyn A. - 1% 7% 26% 44% 22%
41 SOOD Ishani S. - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 7%
41 ZHANG Alina C. - 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 4%
43 FEDELI Caterina S. - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 8%
44 KONG Chin-Yi - 2% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6%
45 LEE Brianna J. - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
46 APELIAN Katherine - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 13%
46 LI Rachel Y. 15% 34% 32% 15% 4% - -
48 LUO Sandra J. 5% 22% 35% 26% 9% 2% -
49 SEO IRENE Y. 8% 27% 34% 22% 8% 1% -
50 DAVIS Bonnie Z. 4% 21% 38% 29% 9% 1%
51 CHEN Chloe I. 8% 29% 38% 21% 4% -
52 MEI Sarah 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% 1%
53 RANDOLPH Piper - 10% 32% 37% 18% 3% -
54 LEE Yumin - 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
55 ORVANANOS Anice 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
56 HAYES Nadia - 10% 31% 37% 18% 3% -
57 CHEN Jessie S. - 4% 20% 36% 28% 9% 1%
58 BREKER Anika - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
59 YU Lauren C. - 12% 34% 35% 15% 2% -
60 SONG Yuqiao Aprille 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
61 BIASCO Anna 1% 6% 20% 33% 27% 11% 1%
62 CHEN Allison V. 1% 13% 35% 35% 14% 2%
63 SABATINI Isabella Ravenne 8% 29% 36% 21% 6% 1%
64 RENTON Samantha 13% 33% 33% 16% 4% 1% -
65 KOROL Neta 1% 7% 24% 36% 24% 7% 1%
66 LIU Joy Zhaoyi 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
67 DRAGNE Alexis D. 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
68 KHOO Lauren A. 2% 13% 30% 32% 18% 5% -
69 FREEDMAN Miranda W. - 1% 5% 20% 38% 30% 6%
70 KIM Rachael 1% 5% 20% 36% 30% 9%
71 LI Shuang 42% 42% 14% 2% - -
72 KOENIG Charlotte R. - - 5% 22% 44% 29%
73 MI Aileen 16% 44% 31% 8% 1% -
74 MILLER Naomi E. 2% 12% 30% 33% 18% 5% -
74 HE Fenghuan 2% 13% 34% 33% 15% 3% -
76 CHO Rebecca H. 1% 7% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
77 DE LA CRUZ Eden 2% 11% 28% 34% 19% 5% 1%
78 YANG Iris 5% 20% 33% 27% 12% 3% -
79 PALMER Meredith K. 10% 30% 34% 19% 6% 1% -
80 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% -
81 CASTANEDA Erika L. 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 2%
82 XUE Alanna L. 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1%
83 CHIN Sia 9% 31% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
84 CALISE Ella 30% 44% 21% 5% 1% - -
85 SUN Ruoxi 5% 21% 33% 27% 11% 2% -
86 MORADI Raiyan N. 33% 45% 19% 3% - - -
87 PENG Amber L. 5% 24% 36% 25% 9% 1% -
88 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 5% 20% 34% 27% 12% 2% -
89 CHO Gracie L. - 8% 29% 38% 20% 4% -
90 WHELAN Amelia 38% 44% 15% 2% - - -
91 KOSTELNY Alexis 19% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
92 MANIKTALA Prisha 36% 41% 18% 4% - - -
93 OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
94 KIM Rachel 23% 45% 25% 6% 1% - -
95 KOO Rachel A. 1% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6% 1%
95 WANDJI Anais 1% 10% 28% 34% 20% 6% 1%
97 MI Anning 34% 41% 19% 5% 1% - -
98 SEAL Julie T. 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
99 VIANNA Gabriella 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
99 LEE Ji Ahn 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
101 SHA Yi Ling 38% 41% 17% 3% - - -
102 ZAMELIS Madelyn 89% 11% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.