Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% |
| 2 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% |
| 3 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 3 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 5 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 6 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 17% | |
| 7 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 8 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 9 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 29% |
| 10 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 11 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 12 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 13 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 14 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
| 15 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 16% | |
| 16 | PALMER Meredith K. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 17 | HAYES Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
| 18 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 7% |
| 19 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 20 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
| 21 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 22 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
| 23 | CHIN Sia | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | ZHANG Yunjia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 25 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 25% |
| 26 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 27 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 28 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 29 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 30 | LUU Shanon K. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 31 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 5% | |
| 32 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 43% |
| 34 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% |
| 35 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 21% |
| 36 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 11% |
| 37 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 37 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 39 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 39 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 42 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 43 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 44 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 45 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 9% | |
| 46 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 47 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 48 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | 2% |
| 49 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% |
| 50 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% |
| 51 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 52 | LIN Zhi tong | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 54 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% |
| 55 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 56 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 38% | 8% | |
| 57 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
| 59 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 60 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 23% |
| 61 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 62 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | |
| 63 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | WU Kyra | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 65 | ROY Layla | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 66 | YAO Ada | 100% | 94% | 57% | 18% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 67 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 68 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 19% | |
| 69 | SEIGEL Norah | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 70 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 71 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 72 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 73 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 73 | VIANNA Gabriella | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 75 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 77 | CEPERO Rosabel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 78 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 79 | GU Maggie Runlin | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 80 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 80 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 3% | |
| 82 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 10% | |
| 83 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 15% | 2% | |
| 84 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
| 85 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 18% | 2% | |
| 86 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 87 | NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 20% |
| 88 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | 4% |
| 89 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 90 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 90 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 92 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
| 93 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 94 | LEE Fiona E. | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 95 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 96 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 5% | |
| 97 | BURBERRY Livia | 100% | 80% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 98 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 99 | MI Anning | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 100 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 101 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 102 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 102 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 102 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 98% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 105 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 106 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 107 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 107 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 107 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 110 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 111 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 112 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 81% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 113 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 114 | RICHARD Dominique | 100% | 70% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 115 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 116 | MI Aileen | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 117 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 118 | HU Felice | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 119 | BRADFORD Meeah | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 120 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 121 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 122 | SABATINI Isabella Ravenne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 123 | YANICELLI Sloane | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 124 | SUN Chloe | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 125 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 99% | 83% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 126 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 126 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 128 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 129 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 130 | TANG AI JIA | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 130 | YU Jane | 100% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 132 | EVELAND Zoe | 100% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 132 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 134 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 135 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 136 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 74% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 137 | BAIXAULI Carme | 100% | 73% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 138 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 139 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 140 | LANDMAN Charlotte | 100% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 141 | DIMAS Constanca | 100% | 93% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 142 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 143 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 144 | WHELAN Amelia | 100% | 82% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 145 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 146 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 147 | HOANG Mai | 100% | 90% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 148 | PHILLIPS Hattie | 100% | 48% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 149 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 29% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 150 | WININGER-SIEVE Taylor | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 150 | RICHARD Clara | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 152 | HOANG Anh | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 153 | LOWTHER Imogen | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 154 | REYNOLDS Lourdes | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.