Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
| 2 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | |
| 3 | FLINT James E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% | |
| 3 | GOOSSENS Bruno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% |
| 5 | BALLARD Mark V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | |
| 6 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 7 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 7% | |
| 8 | PATTERSON Malcolm (Werewolf) D. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 9 | NEWSOME James L. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 10 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 11 | SPAHN Jeff | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% | |
| 12 | RESS Michael A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | HENZLER Thomas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 28% |
| 14 | MOREAU John A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 15 | BLAKLEY Dwain | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 32% | 5% | |
| 16 | REDDING Russel M. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | PARY Theodore | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% | |
| 19 | HEWITT Frank F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 4% | |
| 20 | MULLARKEY Edward (Ed) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% | |
| 21 | HENRY Mark R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
| 22 | WALKER William H. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 47% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | BRONZO Thomas E. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | REA John P. | 100% | 94% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | CAMPE Kazimieras M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 4% | |
| 27 | MOORE Thomas (Tom) L. | 100% | 90% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 28 | HOLLINGSWORTH Frank J. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | 100% | 82% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | FRANK William N. | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | MEHALL Michael | 100% | 90% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | WEBER Dick | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | KENT James (Jim) R. | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | GALLIVAN James | 100% | 45% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.