Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCRUGGS Lauren S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | DUBROVICH Jacqueline | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 3 | TIEU May L. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 3 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 55% | 30% | |
| 5 | RHODES Zander | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 6 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
| 7 | ZHANG Yunjia | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 8 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 9 | RIVANO Camilla | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 10 | DESCHNER Stefani K. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% |
| 11 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
| 12 | PUSTILNIK Nicole | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% | |
| 13 | MASSIALAS Sabrina C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 14 | LUONG Paige K. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 15 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 13% | ||
| 16 | TAFFEL sara | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 17 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 5% |
| 19 | DEVORE Delphine P. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 20 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
| 21 | CATANTAN Samantha Kyle | - | - | - | 6% | 42% | 52% | |
| 22 | CHO Sabrina N. | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 73% | |
| 23 | CHENG Evelyn | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 24 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 8% |
| 25 | LEE Yejine | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 43% | 9% |
| 26 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | HOSONO Rei W. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | CHEN Allison V. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 29 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | MEI Sarah | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 32 | XUE Alanna L. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 33 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% | |
| 34 | MYRONIUK Dariia | - | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 35 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 40% | 34% |
| 37 | NISHIMURA Madeleine A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 38 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 2% |
| 39 | HAYES Nadia | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% | - | |
| 40 | SOOD Ishani S. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 41 | CAO Ying | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 41 | ZHANG Alina C. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 43 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 28% | 3% |
| 44 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 1% | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHENG Vivian | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 47 | KOROL Neta | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 48 | WANDJI Anais | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 41% | 6% |
| 50 | BLOW Iman (Mani) A. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 50 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 52 | LEE Brianna J. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
| 53 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 54 | CAULFIELD Jane | - | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 55 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 56 | HO Brianna W. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 3% |
| 57 | KIM Rachael | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 58 | SHEN Lydia | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 43% | 7% | |
| 59 | JING Emily | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 60 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 61 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
| 62 | SENIC Adeline | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 64 | PARK Rowan M. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 15% | 1% |
| 65 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
| 66 | CHO Rebecca H. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 67 | ORVANANOS Anice | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | BREKER Anika | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 69 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 70 | HE Elizabeth W. | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% | ||
| 71 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 72 | LEE Lavender | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 73 | BIASCO Anna | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 74 | QIAN Crystal | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% |
| 75 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 76 | SABATINI Isabella Ravenne | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 77 | LEE Annora Y. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 44% | 5% |
| 78 | LUU Shanon K. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 79 | LEE Alina | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 51% | 12% | |
| 80 | KIM Rachel | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | GOOR Viviene E. | 1% | 20% | 45% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 82 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 83 | KIM Katherine | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 84 | STAMOS Maria | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 85 | APELIAN Katherine | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 86 | YANKOVSKIY Anastasia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
| 87 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | CEPERO Rosabel | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 89 | YANG Iris | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 90 | CHIN Sia | - | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 91 | RENTON Samantha | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 92 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
| 93 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | PALMER Meredith K. | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 94 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | KNIGHT Skylar | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 97 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 98 | MI Aileen | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 99 | WANG Ellen | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 100 | PROCOPIO Lucia | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 101 | YAO Ada | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 102 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 103 | KOROL Dana | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 104 | WANG Zoie Z. | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 105 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 3% | 33% | 44% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 106 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 107 | HORSLEY Asherah | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 8% |
| 107 | YU Lauren C. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 109 | DIMAS Constanca | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 110 | PENG Amber L. | 2% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 111 | SEO IRENE Y. | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 112 | COOPER Piper W. | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 113 | CHEN Chloe I. | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 114 | WALKER Mayah J. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 115 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 116 | SEAL Julie T. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 116 | LEE Ji Ahn | 20% | 48% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | NOVOSELTSEVA Elizabeth (Liza) M. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 119 | BRADFORD Meeah | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 120 | SUN Ruoxi | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 121 | MI Anning | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | FUNG Vera | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 123 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 15% | 43% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 123 | HALL Velma | 1% | 12% | 42% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 125 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 126 | KHOO Lauren A. | 8% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 127 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 7% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 128 | GU Maggie Runlin | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | ||
| 129 | ADLER Polly Z. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 130 | LI Rachel Y. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 131 | CHO Taylor S. | 1% | 20% | 45% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 132 | ROY Layla | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 133 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 133 | LUO Sandra J. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 135 | WU Kyra | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 136 | DEBACK Greta I. | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 137 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 138 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 139 | RANDOLPH Piper | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 140 | HU Felice | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 141 | LIN Zhi tong | 4% | 42% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 142 | LI Sophia M. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 143 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 31% | 52% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 144 | JO Mia C. | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 145 | CROMPTON Celia N. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 145 | LI Shuang | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 147 | SHENG Chuxi | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 148 | MERGES Gretl C. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 149 | UPTON Elizabeth | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 149 | WONG Sophia M. | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 149 | HOANG Mai | 21% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 152 | CODAZZI chiara | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 153 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 154 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 155 | BATRA Chaahat | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 156 | HUNG Juliana K. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 157 | ZHUANG Sophie | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 158 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 159 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 15% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 160 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 160 | BURBERRY Livia | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 162 | SHA Yi Ling | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 162 | WHELAN Amelia | 43% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 164 | YURKOVA Mariia | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 165 | ZHANG Eunice | 45% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 166 | MAO Rebecca J. | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.