Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 2 | LIN Audrey J. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 3 | LEE Hannah | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 5 | LIU Sophie | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 6 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 7 | JUNG Irene | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 8 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 9 | CHIN Erika J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 13% |
| 10 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 11 | LU Vivian Y. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 12 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 13 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 15 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | HILD Nisha | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 18 | TONG Kunling | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 19 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 20 | DUCKETT Madison | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 12% |
| 21 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 21 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 23 | MARSEE Samantha | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 24 | CAO Stephanie X. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
| 25 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 23% | |
| 26 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% | |
| 27 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 28 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 31 | SHI Cathleen | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 32 | FESTA Carina | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 33 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 34 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 35 | BILILIES Sophia | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | XIAO julie | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | SADOVA Olga | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 39 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | LIU Zhi Jun | 1% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 42 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 43 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 43% | 19% |
| 44 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 11% |
| 45 | KIM Marley I. | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 46 | LIU Yifei | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 48 | WU Helen | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 49 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 50 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 51 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 6% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 53 | SENOGLU Irmak | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LIGH Erenei J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 55 | GHAYALOD reya | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 56 | LACSON Sarah | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 57 | FEIG Sela | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 59 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 60 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 61 | NGUYEN Siena | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 62 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 63 | LU Amy | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 64 | KER Grace | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 65 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 66 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 67 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 68 | HE Charlotte | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 69 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
| 70 | SO Catelyn | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 71 | NATH Trisha | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 72 | CHEN Ashley | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 73 | MARYASH Samantha | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 74 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 75 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 76 | CHIANG Emily | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 20% | 3% | |
| 77 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 78 | SPRINGER Ella | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 79 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 80 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 81 | HOLMES Emma | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 82 | LU Elaine | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 82 | PABIAN Emilia | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 85 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 85 | LEE Sophia | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 85 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 88 | ZHANG Victoria | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | CHANG Audrey | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 90 | WU Erica L. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 91 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 92 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 93 | STONE Hava S. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
| 93 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 95 | KHAN Alissa | 14% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 96 | DILLE Carolina G. | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 96 | SCOTT Eve | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 98 | SINHA Anika | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 99 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 101 | SHUM Cindy | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | LIN Nicole | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 103 | TUNG Renee | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 105 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 106 | CHANG Emily | - | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 107 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 108 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
| 108 | YANG Lea | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 110 | SZETO Chloe | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 111 | NI Sharon | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 111 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 114 | DAI Olivia | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | NGUYEN Ella | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 115 | FANG Sophie | 15% | 43% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 117 | YU Zhiang | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 118 | KIM Sujin | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 118 | DHAR Aamina | 2% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 120 | KATZ Anat | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 120 | HUNG Anna | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 122 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 123 | TONG Jessie | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 124 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 42% | 43% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 125 | SCHICK Veronica | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 126 | STONE Coral | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 127 | HORMEL Molly | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 128 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 129 | ATTIA Jasmine | 25% | 47% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 130 | JEONG Katie | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 131 | MAKLIN Sofia | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 132 | ISBERG Natalie | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 133 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 134 | MUND Ruth | 8% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 135 | ELSHAKANKIRI Janna | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 136 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 136 | PAL Anjali G. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 136 | YUAN Greta | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 139 | CHIN Elise | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 140 | WEI Vivian W. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 141 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 142 | FAN Grace | 17% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 142 | HUANG MADELINE | 2% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 144 | CHAVAN Arya | 44% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 145 | TREACY Aisling | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 146 | CHO Michelle | 30% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 147 | YAN Lena | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 148 | YEN Natalie | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 149 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 149 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 149 | DONG Angel | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 152 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 152 | CHEN Jessica | 8% | 35% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 154 | BROWN Delaney | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 155 | DUDNICK Morgan | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 156 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 156 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 156 | HU Michelle | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 156 | WALLER London | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 160 | PASSALARIS Joanna M. | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.