The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

January NAC

Vet-60 Men's Saber

Monday, January 9, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Louisville, KY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 MATT Chris - - 1% 15% 45% 38%
2 KIZIK Val - - 1% 15% 58% 26%
3 LUNDBORG Mark R. - - - 5% 38% 57%
3 BUKOWSKI Todd - 1% 13% 38% 37% 10%
5 RUNYAN Joshua - - - 3% 31% 65%
6 SRERE Mark A. - 1% 8% 28% 41% 21%
7 KASTOR Jacaeber - 1% 14% 39% 36% 10%
8 NEVEROVICH Vitaly V. - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
9 HECK Steven D. - - 9% 38% 41% 11%
10 WILDMAN Steve 1% 9% 40% 37% 12% 1%
11 KAOURIS George - 5% 30% 48% 15% 1%
12 HICHA Paul R. 1% 8% 26% 38% 22% 5%
13 KRASNICH Mike - 11% 38% 36% 13% 2%
14 GUEBLE Jeffrey R. - - 3% 25% 55% 17%
15 LEAR Donald W. - 16% 52% 27% 5% -
16 ANTHONY Jr Donald K. - - 8% 35% 43% 14%
17 KOPYLOV Dmitri - - 2% 16% 44% 39%
18 LILLARD Samuel N. - 2% 11% 31% 39% 17%
19 CRETEN joachim 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
20 DAHL Chris 1% 32% 47% 18% 1% -
21 MALNATI Donald H. - 2% 15% 39% 35% 9%
22 GRAINGER Robert 2% 20% 48% 26% 3% -
23 MYERS Brent M. - 2% 19% 41% 31% 7%
24 CHAMBERS Thomas J. 1% 29% 48% 21% 2% -
25 MCLAUGHLIN Joseph R. 6% 48% 36% 9% 1% -
26 GORMLEY Peter J. 53% 38% 9% 1% - -
27 ZINNI Gene 4% 62% 31% 4% - -
28 BLAIR III Ray H. 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1%
29 GRAFF Jon - 10% 39% 43% 8% -
30 GILLESPIE Jeremy W. 92% 8% - - - -
31 ELDER John 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% -
32 SU Ji 16% 52% 27% 4% - -
33 GREEN Robert 58% 36% 6% - - -
34 PEREIRA Gabriel 93% 7% - - - -
35 ASHBY Rob 82% 17% 1% - - -
36 SIGNORELLI Sam F. 21% 61% 16% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.