Louisville, KY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MORENO BRIONES Patricio A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | PAI Dong-Ying | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | HABALA Peter | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | TANG Julian | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 5 | PHILLIPS Jasper | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 6 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | V V V V V D | V V D | 6.0 | 5 | -1.0 |
| 7 | EPPLY-SCHMIDT Paul | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 8 | PAVLOVICH Robert | V D V V D D | V V D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
| 9 | POWERS Douglas A. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | CHO Michael | V V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | DARRICAU Henri J. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | GONZALEZ Eric J. | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 13 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | KOEHN Ted | V V D D V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 15 | STURGIS Bruce T. | D V V V D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 16 | PASHBY Stephen N. | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | V V V V V V | D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 18 | LAWRENCE John W. | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 | |
| 19 | FADL Omar | V D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 20 | ROBINSON Timothy | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 21 | POPOKH Leo | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 23 | VALENTINE Iain | V V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 24 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 25 | ESTELL Oscar M. | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 26 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | V D V D V D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 28 | PATTERSON Malcolm (Werewolf) D. | V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 29 | GREEN Michael C. | D V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | MARIANI Lou | D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | TOMASI John | D V V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 32 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | D V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 33 | JOHANSON David B. | D D V D V V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 34 | WILBERT Matt | V V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 35 | DRAKE David L. | D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | SCHOENACK Jason A. | D D V D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 37 | LEYLAND John | D V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 38 | RUSANOV Oleg | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 39 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 40 | WU Clarence C. | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 41 | KLEIN Johannes | D D V D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
| 42 | GLADNICK Michael J. | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 43 | HILL David E. | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 44 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 45 | MELCHIOR Donald L. | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 46 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 47 | ALLAN Peter L. | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 48 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 49 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 50 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 51 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 51 | NEWELL Tim | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 53 | WEMPLE Charles | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.