Pasadena Convention Center - Visitors Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Howard | - | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 80% |
| 2 | LI linze | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 3 | ANDRES Michael | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 3 | RONG Jasper | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 5 | HWANG Jayden | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 31% |
| 6 | TANI Tino | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 7 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 15% |
| 8 | YANG Phillip | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 9 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 67% |
| 10 | LIU Yijin | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 11 | BROCK Landon | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 12 | HWANG Hagan | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 11% |
| 13 | LEE Nathan Uju | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | WANG Tiger | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
| 15 | ARISTOV Ilya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 15% |
| 16 | ZHANG KAIQI | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 17 | XIAO Brayden | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 18 | CHEN Cooper | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | < 1% |
| 19 | WINTERSET Mason | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | BURRES kenneth | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 21 | CHI Everett | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | WANG Edward | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 23 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 24 | KROON Landon | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 25 | WANG Kyle | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | OU Rigel | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | FU BRANDEN | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 27 | MINASIAN Mason | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 29 | YPHANTIDES Alexander | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
| 30 | KOZLOFF Wyatt | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LI Philip | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 32 | ZHANG Richard Y. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | HAO Johnny | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | LIU Daniel | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | IM Tyler | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 36 | HAN Kyle | 3% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | GU Andrew | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 38 | QI Jeremy | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | LIANG Preston | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SANDOVAL-BRIOSO Jakob | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SRIVATSAV Anay | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | YUEN Caleb | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 43 | LEE Brian | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 44 | WARD Carter | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HIOE Aaron | 4% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | LO Lei | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 47 | OLSEN Dane | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | BRUM Charles E. | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | CHIANG Tyson | 7% | 37% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | LEE Bill King | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CHEN Boaz | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | FREY Elias | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 54 | KOU Xiaoyi | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | LI Ryan | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 56 | SEE Ryan | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | RYU Andrew Junsang | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | CHIOU Aaron | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | SUN Eon | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | LEE Matthew | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 61 | COOK Ridgely | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | GRIFFIN Sid | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.