The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Capitol Clash SYC/RCC

Y-14 Women's Foil

Sunday, January 15, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center - National Harbor, DC, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 CALISE Ella V V V D V V V V V V V V 5.7 5 -0.7
2 LIN Zhi tong V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
3 WANG Jasmine V V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
3 SHEN Emilia V V D V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
5 AMR HOSSNY Sara V V V V V V V V V D 5.8 6 +0.2
6 YURKOVA Mariia V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
7 SONG Yuqiao Aprille V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
8 SHENG Chuxi V V V V V D V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
9 WANG Zoie Z. V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
10 SHMAY Anastasia V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
11 ZHENG Julie V V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
12 SUN Chloe V D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
13 BROWN Lola V D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
14 BORGES Valeryn V V V V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
15 CHO Emily (Euran) V V D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
16 KUMAMOTO Shino D V V D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
17 WANG CAROL V V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
18 PEVZNER Nicole V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
19 LAI Sophia V V V V V D V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
19 FENG Grace V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
21 DAVIS Logan V V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
22 ZELDIN Nadia V V D V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
23 WANG Amabel V V V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
24 HARRIS Julia V V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
25 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) V V V V V D V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
26 YANG Emma V D V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
27 LI Sophia M. V V V D V D V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
28 FIELD Julianna D D V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
29 BIODROWICZ Julia D D V V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
30 LIU Enjia sherry D V V D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
31 WANG Sophia V V V D V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
32 ZHANG Soleil C. V V V D D D V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
33 MCSHERRY Ava V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
34 REN Kayley V V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
35 SWANSON Alexa V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
36 WANG Joanna V V D V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
37 YU Jane V V V V D V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
38 GAO Anne D V V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
39 LI Eleanor V D V V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
40 JOO Natalie V D V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
41 KAPRAN Anastasia V D V D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
42 COLLINS Anna D V D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
43 FIELD Elizabeth V V V D D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
44 VIJAYAKUMAR Diya V V D V D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
45 DENG Melissa V V V V D D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
46 HAFEZ Tahiyah V V D D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
47 BING Charlotte V V D V V D V 1.9 4 +2.1
48 LI Han (Helina) V D V V V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
49 DONG Angela V V D V D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
50 LI Katerina V D D V V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
51 PAULUS Sloane E. D V V D D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
52 SHENG Katherine D V V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
53 TANG Melody Fujiao D V V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
54 TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite V D V D D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
55 LEE emily V D V D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
56 MAGALLANES GABRIELA D D D V V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
57 MAJID Inaaya D D V V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
58 WANG DINA C. V V D V D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
59 BURGESS Logan D V D V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
59 DIMATULAC Elise Ann D V D V D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
61 SHMUKLER Maria V V D D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
62 HU Jenna V D D D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
63 XIE Lillian V D D D D V V D 4.2 2 -2.2
64 MA Isabelle D D D V D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
65 LICHTENSTEIGER Megan V V V D V D D 2.6 4 +1.4
66 CHERNYKH Elina D V V D D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
67 FENG Audrey V D V D V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
68 SELSER Ella D D V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
69 RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone D V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
70 DESERANNO Seren V D D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
71 HUSSIAN Annabelle D D V V D D D 1.3 2 +0.7
72 LIN Yunong D V D D V D D 2.0 2 -
73 CHEN Sophie D D V D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
73 SHTEPA Rada D D D D V V D 1.4 2 +0.6
75 ARMSTRONG Olivia D V D D V D D 2.8 2 -0.8
76 CAO Kayla D V D D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
77 TAMIR Esu D V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
78 AADHI Hansika D V V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
79 LI Savannah D V D D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
80 KIM Claire D D V V D D D 1.3 2 +0.7
81 LI Xiang (Shining) D V D V D D D 0.8 2 +1.2
82 JIANG Chloe D D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
83 ORRINGER Lottie D D D V V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
84 LEE Allison V D D D D D D 0.3 1 +0.7
85 SNYDERS Evelyn D D D D V D D 1.1 1 -0.1
86 TEPMAN Alexandra D. D D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
87 KATS Ekaterina D D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
88 CHIANG Mila D D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
89 IQBAL Mariam D D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
90 CAVANAGH Emma D D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
91 KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily D V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
92 WANG Selina D D D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
93 TAN Dorathy D D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
94 TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia V D D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
95 CAMPBELL June D D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
96 MCFARLANE Asha D V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
97 CANO Sofia D D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
97 SHEBL Nadia D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
99 CULLIVAN Sienna D D D D D D D 3.5 0 -3.5
99 KIM Sophia D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
101 QUINTERO Camila D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
102 KATS Elizaveta D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
102 FEDER Acadia D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
104 ZHANG Zoey D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
105 BERGMANN Beatrix D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
106 LEE Emma D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
107 BARCZAK Rebekah D D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
108 DARPINO Chloe D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
109 MORSE Katherine D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
109 ORBE-AUSTIN Nia D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
111 MOON Eleni D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
112 MOORE Addisyn D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.