Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CORNETT Sawyer R. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 22% | |
| 2 | CLAYPOOL Conner | - | - | 4% | 36% | 48% | 12% | |
| 3 | SON Eric | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 3 | SMITH Erick | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 5 | SMITH Brandon T. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 6 | PINKERTON Joseph H. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 7 | WANG Jim | 1% | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
| 8 | DEMOSS Mercedes | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 9 | DENMAN Matthew L. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
| 10 | MARCUS Peter | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
| 11 | KOZINSKI Allison E. | 1% | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 12 | LEE Claire L. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 13 | PRIJATEL John R. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 14 | SOARE Maria Elena | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | HAAS Zane | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | HAZEL Susan L. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 18 | BAILEY Lauren | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 19 | DEMOSS Sophia | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 20 | DENIHAN John | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 21 | DICKSON Tim | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 22 | BERNWANGER Phillip | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 23 | JAMES John | 6% | 31% | 47% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | DVORAK Ryan | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | SIDARAS John | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.