Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 2 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 3 | HICKEY Connor | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | DESERANNO Leander | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 42% |
| 5 | LU Alex | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 6 | RUSSELL Paul | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 11% |
| 7 | OZAWA Taishi | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 8 | LIU Yinhong | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 14% |
| 9 | KNIBBE Nathan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | ZHOU Justin | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 11 | TAN Xinlai | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 12 | TATE Linus | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
| 13 | FRASER Rhys | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | TAN Charlie | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 15 | SCHAUER Jack | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 16 | FANG Haoyu | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | DEPP Edward | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 18 | DIFRANK Avery | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 19 | ZHAO Jason | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 20 | ZMUDA Aiden | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 21 | WENGER Rowan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | STINNETT Brady | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 23 | KAGAN Noah | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 24 | WENGER Liam | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 25 | WANG Caleb | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 26 | HONG Derek | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LATORRE Leonardo | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | DIFRANK Tae | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | LARSON Vaughn | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | SMITH Henry | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | GE Felix Fei | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | TURNER Jackson | 3% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | - | - |
| 35 | HICKEY Dylan | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | ZHANG Hanson | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ELTOFT Caden | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 38 | BALES Gabriel | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | GOGOI Kavi | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | IBARRA Alejandro | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 41 | PAYNE Lynas | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ROMENESKO Bryce | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 43 | GONZALEZ Rocky | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | BANNICK Evan | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | MCGRATH Milo | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 46 | NG Gavin | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | GREULICH Nikolas | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | CHASE Crosby | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | MARTIN Wesley | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LI Andy | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | CRONK Trevor | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | SYMMANK Callen | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | HALLETTMANES Ezra | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | GOSTRYY Grigory | 1% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 57 | CHAN William | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | GARRARD Jeremiah | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | NOTHIAS Sebastien | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 60 | CARLSON Avery | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 61 | HILDEBRANDT Gerhard | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | BANNICK Elliott | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.