Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOODLEY Colin | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 48% | |
| 2 | DIMMETT David C. | - | - | 4% | 33% | 47% | 15% | |
| 3 | PETERS Nathan M. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 3 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 78% |
| 5 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% | |
| 6 | STEPHENS Corbin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 41% | 5% |
| 7 | JHA Rahul | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
| 8 | ZALEWSKI David | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 9 | ZOOK Evan D. | - | 4% | 26% | 51% | 17% | 1% | |
| 10 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 1% |
| 11 | WALLACE George | 4% | 38% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | MCDOWELL Finn | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 13 | WOODLEY George | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 14 | ANDERSON Dean R. | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 37% | 3% | |
| 15 | SEID Zachary W. | 2% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | ZELENSKY Paul | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 18 | SHOWALTER Zachary | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 5% | |
| 19 | SMYTH Sefton K. | 6% | 49% | 39% | 6% | - | - | |
| 20 | LUCOT Benjamin | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SAUNIER Cameron | 10% | 40% | 42% | 7% | - | - | |
| 22 | BARTLETT Lauren | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | LUNDEN Espen | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 24 | GIAMPETRO Nicholas | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | SIMS Martin L. | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.