ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 2 | ANAND Rohan | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | BRANDT Jaden | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 3 | LIN Maxim | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 5 | BERA Enzo | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
| 6 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 7 | ATWOOD Griffin | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% | |
| 8 | SAGE Sebastian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 44% | 15% |
| 9 | LIU Kevin | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 10 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 11 | NGUYEN Anthony | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
| 12 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% |
| 13 | LAUB William | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 14 | CLARK Aram | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 15 | BONETTI Brayden | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% | |
| 16 | ANAND Rishab | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 17 | URSU Marcel T. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 42% |
| 18 | OH Aster | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 19 | CHUNG Connor | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 17% |
| 20 | PEREIRA Beckham | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | OLOUGHLIN Quin | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | AO Christopher | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 4% |
| 23 | ALLARDYCE Graham | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 24 | NAYAK Surin K. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 1% |
| 25 | LEE Andrew | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 26 | TSAO Oliver | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% | |
| 27 | PINTO Marcus | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 28 | LEE Griffin | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | SAKAYEDA Jacob | - | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | SASSI Ilyas | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | MATTOO Deven | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | WITCZAK Mateus | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 1% |
| 35 | MONTALVO Matthew | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 37 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 38 | ALLARDYCE Lachlan | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 39 | TANG Shu Hon | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 45% | 18% |
| 40 | SHINCHUK Daniel | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | WAXLER Ryan | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | AYDOGDU Hakan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | LIGH Checed | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | WONG Caleb W. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 45 | DEELY Hartigan | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 2% |
| 46 | GOMEZ Emilio | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% | |
| 48 | ZHANG Ray | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 49 | PORTER Dupree | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
| 50 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | BALE Atman | 4% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 52 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 53 | CHANG Timothy | 7% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | TSAO Alister | 29% | 42% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | GERTSBERG Eli | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | UEMOTO Ken | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 3% |
| 57 | CHEN Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 58 | SHAH Sohan | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | ONG Dylan | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 60 | KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 61 | SHAPIRO Simon | 3% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 62 | JIANG Terence | 36% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 63 | VOHRA Ekam | 26% | 50% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 64 | TSATSAS Andreas | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 65 | BHANDARE Niev | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 66 | LIU Andrew | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 67 | MARTINSON Torm | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 68 | KENNEDY Tomás | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | MAGITSKY Isaac | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | GORDON Samuel | 9% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 70 | CRAWFORD William | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 73 | SARWAHI Viraat | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 74 | JAIN Karanvir | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 75 | CAREY Sam | 4% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 76 | CHEA Caden | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 76 | HU Jayden | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 78 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | PATEL Arush | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 80 | TAYCHER Aaron | 5% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 81 | MIR Alexander | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | MILLET Etienne | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | CUSSON William | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | MADHAVAN Arjun | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 87 | FARBER Jake | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 88 | SUH Leo | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 38% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 89 | TSAI Kai-An | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 91 | TUNIK Joshuah | 11% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | GRAVES Connor | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 93 | BUDAEV Artem | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.