ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 39% |
| 2 | KHAN Alissa | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 3 | FESTA Carina | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 3 | GOMERMAN Sophia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 5 | LEE Sophia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 6 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 7 | KANDADAI Lara | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 3% |
| 8 | LAURI Keira | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 9 | BERMAN Greta | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
| 10 | FEIG Sela | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 11 | MALEK Zolie | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 12 | ZHANG Sophie | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 13 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 44% |
| 14 | MONTORIO Lily M. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 15 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 8% |
| 16 | SCOTT Eve | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 17 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 18 | MARYASH Samantha | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 19 | MUND Ruth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 20 | GUVEN Coco | - | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 10% |
| 22 | YU Zhiang | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 23 | CHIANG Melissa | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | LIU Kelly | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 25 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 49% | 25% |
| 27 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | DONG Angel | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 30 | NAYAK Esha | - | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 31 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | MYAT Chloe | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | CHEN Jessica | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 34 | WANG yining | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 35 | PROBASCO Leila | - | 3% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 36 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
| 37 | KNOBEL Sophia | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | YAN Lena | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | HU Anna | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 42 | KHOST Maeve | 1% | 14% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SHMULER Fiona | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | ZENG Sarah | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 45 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | CHOU Amy R. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 47 | SPEARS Mya B | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 48 | ONG Lauren | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | LI Alexis | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | DAI Olivia | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 51 | GUGALA Hanna | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | KHERA Anya | 47% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | MAGITSKY Leila | 4% | 27% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | - | 7% | 42% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 54 | BAIREDDY Maya | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | BUSH Bethany | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 57 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 3% | 19% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | NAYAK Antara | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | BAWA Anahat | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 63 | SVENSSON Siri Lin | 35% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | BAINS Nandini | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | LAMEDICA Ava | 17% | 37% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 45% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 67 | CHO Kaeli M. | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 68 | XU Demi | 22% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 69 | RESTREPO URREGO Laura | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 70 | ALAMI Amira | 32% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | TU Sadie | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 72 | SULLIVAN Siobhan | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 73 | TAYLOR Lindsay | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 74 | BORGUETA Madison | 7% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 76 | YAO Annabelle | 35% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 37% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.