Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Chenqiao | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | LU Kevin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 3 | WU Alber Y. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | CHANG Jonathan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | LI Richard | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 6 | BIELER Mason | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 8 | YANG Charles | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 10 | ZHANG Lucas | V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 11 | ZHANG Raphael | V V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | ZHONG Maxwell | D D V V V V | V V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 14 | LI Edison M. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 15 | DENG David | D D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | ONG Nicholas | D D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 17 | CHAN Joseph | V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 18 | HAYES Stewart | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 19 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | V V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | QU Zhida (richard) | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | YOU Alan | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 22 | WANG Tiger | D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 23 | NAIR Sujit | V V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 24 | CHANG Jeremy | V D V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 25 | ZHOU Ryan | D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | WANDJI Noah | D V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 27 | FUKUDA Brando | V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 28 | SISINNI Leonardo | V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 29 | KIM Seoheul | D V V V D | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 30 | YANG Tate | V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 31 | ZHOU Shawn | V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 32 | WONNEBERG Luke | D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 33 | PUSHKIN HUANG Yam | D D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 34 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | V V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 35 | ZHANG Max | V V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 36 | ROBERTS Nikolai | V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 37 | YAN Rian | D V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 38 | HUYNH Matthew | V V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 39 | SU Preston | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 40 | RAU Shogun | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 41 | HO Christopher | D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 42 | GUO Joey | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 43 | SHENOY sean | D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 44 | LEE Joshua | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 45 | WU Thomas | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 46 | HE Ian | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 47 | JIANG Sean | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 48 | BHUPATHIRAJU Arjun | D D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 49 | IRELAND Jack | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 50 | SLAIN Owen | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 51 | IYOKI Sean | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 52 | YANG Steve | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 53 | MAZAHERI Theodore | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 54 | THOMAS Noah | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 55 | CHEN Andrew | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 56 | GALERO Suther | D D D D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
| 57 | PARK Jayden | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.